(2013/05/16 16:22), Dave Page wrote:
> Which, btw, means it should really be 09.02.0100, unless we're going
> to change the scheme.
Now I'm inclined to 9.2.0100.
Version 9.2 should have been released before and then
the next release would be the last release of 9.2.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue