Thread: which mailing list for bindings writers
Ciao, I am writing a binding between Libpq and a high-level language; I am no expert of PG; I already follow PG-announce and PG-weekly-news. Which mailing list should I follow to have enough informations to be up to date? I see that pgsql-interfaces is marked inactive. TIA -- Marco Maggi
Marco Maggi wrote: > Ciao, > > I am writing a binding between Libpq and a high-level > language; I am no expert of PG; I already follow PG-announce > and PG-weekly-news. Which mailing list should I follow to > have enough informations to be up to date? I see that > pgsql-interfaces is marked inactive. Well, all new development happens on the hackers list. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Marco Maggi wrote: > "Bruce Momjian" wrote: > >> Which mailing list should I follow to have enough > >> informations to be up to date? > > > > Well, all new development happens on the hackers list. > > Ugh! While the recent "Python Driver Confusion" is the kind > of thread I want to read, pgsql-hackers is overkill for > my needs... Agreed, but what should we recommend? We really don't have a place for interface writers to learn about Postgres changes since most of our interfaces are now external to the main project. Would reading the weekly Postgres news be sufficient? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
"Bruce Momjian" wrote: >> Which mailing list should I follow to have enough >> informations to be up to date? > > Well, all new development happens on the hackers list. Ugh! While the recent "Python Driver Confusion" is the kind of thread I want to read, pgsql-hackers is overkill for my needs... -- Marco Maggi