Thread: JDO
Are there plans to add support for JDO (Java Data Objects)?
What support would be required from the driver? Dave On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 19:56, John Pfersich wrote: > Are there plans to add support for JDO (Java Data Objects)? > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org -- Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net>
Anyone knows of any plans of implementing the setCatalog method in Connection? Regards, Patrik Lundgren
Patrik, It is currently implemented. Because of how postgres connections work, setCatalog is a noop. In postgres a connection connects to a specific database. There is no way that a connection can be repointed to a different database (that would be a different connection). So setCatalog is implemented in the only way that is compatible with the postgres architecture. thanks, --Barry Patrik Lundgren wrote: > Anyone knows of any plans of implementing the setCatalog method in > Connection? > > Regards, > Patrik Lundgren > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html >
But when I use pgAdmin II I can administrate the different catalogs. Are you saying that a different connection is created for each catalog? Regards -------------------------------------------- Patrik, It is currently implemented. Because of how postgres connections work, setCatalog is a noop. In postgres a connection connects to a specific database. There is no way that a connection can be repointed to a different database (that would be a different connection). So setCatalog is implemented in the only way that is compatible with the postgres architecture. thanks, --Barry Patrik Lundgren wrote: > Anyone knows of any plans of implementing the setCatalog method in > Connection? > > Regards, > Patrik Lundgren > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Attachment
Yes, they connect to each catalog over a seperate conection. Dave On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 16:04, Patrik Lundgren wrote: > But when I use pgAdmin II I can administrate the different catalogs. Are > you saying that a different connection is created for each catalog? > > Regards > > -------------------------------------------- > > Patrik, > > It is currently implemented. Because of how postgres connections work, > setCatalog is a noop. In postgres a connection connects to a specific > database. There is no way that a connection can be repointed to a > different database (that would be a different connection). So > setCatalog is implemented in the only way that is compatible with the > postgres architecture. > > thanks, > --Barry > > > Patrik Lundgren wrote: > > Anyone knows of any plans of implementing the setCatalog method in > > Connection? > > > > Regards, > > Patrik Lundgren > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of > > broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net>