Thread: RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)

RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)

From
Peter Mount
Date:
If you mean the javax.sql standard extensions, they are in the 7.0
release.

ie: I'm currently merging the supplied sources into the cvs source at
the moment.

Peter

-- 
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.



-----Original Message-----
From: Jaume Pausas [mailto:a1649@dis.ulpgc.es]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 1:16 PM
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)


Hi

I´ve been reading a short course about jdbc 2.0 and there put that some
drivers includes implementation of the ConnectionPoolDataSource
interface. Does postgresql driver include it?

Anybody have an implementation of a spooled database?



************


Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)

From
"Joe Shevland"
Date:
Oi oi! Is 7.0 close and whats in the beast?

Thanks,
Joe

--
Any views stated are in the hope that Peter Mount
moves quickly on the PostgreSQL JDBC driver ;)


----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Mount" <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
To: "'Jaume Pausas'" <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>; <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 6:14 AM
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)


> If you mean the javax.sql standard extensions, they are in the 7.0
> release.
>
> ie: I'm currently merging the supplied sources into the cvs source at
> the moment.
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Mount
> Enterprise Support
> Maidstone Borough Council
> Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaume Pausas [mailto:a1649@dis.ulpgc.es]
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 1:16 PM
> To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
> Subject: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
>
>
> Hi
>
> I´ve been reading a short course about jdbc 2.0 and there put that some
> drivers includes implementation of the ConnectionPoolDataSource
> interface. Does postgresql driver include it?
>
> Anybody have an implementation of a spooled database?
>
>
>
> ************
>
> ************
>



Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)

From
Assaf Arkin
Date:
> > Anybody have an implementation of a spooled database?

Spooled?

arkin

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Assaf Arkin                                           www.exoffice.com
CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc.                        www.exolab.org


Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)

From
"Joe Shevland"
Date:
Hi,

Whats the status/go with stream support for JDBC?

My questions are will the backend allow
it (using JDBC, not native) and would it
be too hard to point the stream support
at the large object API?

i.e. anything that's a setBinaryStream()
or whatnot just serializes the object.

Also, whats involved with getting a
LO reaping mechanism permanently in place?
I'm doing some stuff with Java objects
at the moment and LO reaping and the
stream support strike me as pretty
necessary.


Cheers,
Joe



----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Shevland" <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
To: "Peter Mount" <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; "'Jaume Pausas'" <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>;
<pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)


> Oi oi! Is 7.0 close and whats in the beast?
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
> --
> Any views stated are in the hope that Peter Mount
> moves quickly on the PostgreSQL JDBC driver ;)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Mount" <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
> To: "'Jaume Pausas'" <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>; <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 6:14 AM
> Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
>
>
> > If you mean the javax.sql standard extensions, they are in the 7.0
> > release.
> >
> > ie: I'm currently merging the supplied sources into the cvs source at
> > the moment.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > --
> > Peter Mount
> > Enterprise Support
> > Maidstone Borough Council
> > Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jaume Pausas [mailto:a1649@dis.ulpgc.es]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 1:16 PM
> > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
> > Subject: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
> >
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I´ve been reading a short course about jdbc 2.0 and there put that some
> > drivers includes implementation of the ConnectionPoolDataSource
> > interface. Does postgresql driver include it?
> >
> > Anybody have an implementation of a spooled database?
> >
> >
> >
> > ************
> >
> > ************
> >
>
>
> ************
>



Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)

From
Joseph Shraibman
Date:
Joe Shevland wrote:

> Oi oi! Is 7.0 close and whats in the beast?
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
Read the newsgroup muc.lists.postgres.hackers to get an idea. One thing I am
disappointed in is that big tuples seem to have been dropped from the 7.0
release. See http://www.postgresql.org/projects/devel-toast.html for the
progress on that project.