Thread: RE: [INTERFACES] JDBC and character sets

It shouldn't bloat the driver by that much. As we already issue a few
queries on startup, I'll add a suggested test, and if that works ok, I
should have UNICODE support done by the end of the weekend.

Peter

-- 
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.



-----Original Message-----
From: David Warnock [mailto:david@sundayta.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 5:46 PM
To: Peter Mount
Cc: 'Herouth Maoz'; pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC and character sets


Peter,

Obviously I agree 100% that supporting unicode should not break existing
applications or code.

How about either a extra parameter to the creation of a connection?

If it is easier to keep this very separate I don't mind a completely
separate jar file/driver at least to start with. After all most people
won't yet be using this feature so why bloat their driver?

Dave
-- 
David Warnock
Sundayta Ltd

Peter,

My oh my isn't free software awesome. 

Many thanks

Dave

> It shouldn't bloat the driver by that much. As we already issue a few
> queries on startup, I'll add a suggested test, and if that works ok, I
> should have UNICODE support done by the end of the weekend.

-- 
David Warnock
Sundayta Ltd