Thread: RE: [HACKERS] PREPARE

RE: [HACKERS] PREPARE

From
"Taral"
Date:
> Is the current transaction model adequate or do we need nested
> transactions ?

Err... I didn't answer your question, did I? The COS Transaction Service
implements nested transactions.

Taral


RE: [HACKERS] PREPARE

From
"Taral"
Date:
> > Is the current transaction model adequate or do we need nested
> > transactions ?
>
> Err... I didn't answer your question, did I? The COS Transaction Service
> implements nested transactions.

Aha... finally found the line I was looking for:

"An implementation of the Transaction Service is not required to support
nested transactions."

Taral


Re: [INTERFACES] RE: [HACKERS] PREPARE

From
tolik@icomm.ru (Anatoly K. Lasareff)
Date:
>>>>> "T" == Taral  <taral@cyberjunkie.com> writes:

 >> > Is the current transaction model adequate or do we need nested
 >> > transactions ?
 >>
 >> Err... I didn't answer your question, did I? The COS Transaction Service
 >> implements nested transactions.

 T> Aha... finally found the line I was looking for:

 T> "An implementation of the Transaction Service is not required to support
 T> nested transactions."

To my mind there are _no_ nested transactions in Postgres.


--
Anatoly K. Lasareff              Email:       tolik@icomm.ru
Senior programmer