Re: [INTERFACES] RE: [HACKERS] PREPARE - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From tolik@icomm.ru (Anatoly K. Lasareff)
Subject Re: [INTERFACES] RE: [HACKERS] PREPARE
Date
Msg-id x7n25pa19e.fsf@tolikus.hq.aaanet.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: [HACKERS] PREPARE  ("Taral" <taral@cyberjunkie.com>)
List pgsql-interfaces
>>>>> "T" == Taral  <taral@cyberjunkie.com> writes:

 >> > Is the current transaction model adequate or do we need nested
 >> > transactions ?
 >>
 >> Err... I didn't answer your question, did I? The COS Transaction Service
 >> implements nested transactions.

 T> Aha... finally found the line I was looking for:

 T> "An implementation of the Transaction Service is not required to support
 T> nested transactions."

To my mind there are _no_ nested transactions in Postgres.


--
Anatoly K. Lasareff              Email:       tolik@icomm.ru
Senior programmer

pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Peter T Mount
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] problem of upper/lower case in table names
Next
From: Constantin Teodorescu
Date:
Subject: Re: Primary Keys and Foreign Keys in PgAccess