Thread: Cross-check recent documentation changes
Hi,
Was reviewing recent commits, and it seems the following commit adds an extra line to some comments. Just wanted to cross-check if that was intentional.
Commit: http://goo.gl/zxA00l
Pre-Commit: http://goo.gl/2DpLxi
Post-Commit: http://goo.gl/eKcNm3
Apologies for the noise, if this was intentional.
--
Robins Tharakan
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Robins <robins@pobox.com> wrote: > Was reviewing recent commits, and it seems the following commit adds an > extra line to some comments. Just wanted to cross-check if that was > intentional. I don't see that it changed any comments at all? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On 2015/10/29 17:10, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Robins <robins@pobox.com> wrote: >> Was reviewing recent commits, and it seems the following commit adds an >> extra line to some comments. Just wanted to cross-check if that was >> intentional. > > I don't see that it changed any comments at all? I think he means error messages, for example, why errmsg is replaced by errmsg_plural in the concerned source code line (the following change) - errmsg("database with OID %u must be vacuumed before %d more multixact members are used", + errmsg_plural("database with OID %u must be vacuumed before %d more multixact member is used", + "database with OID %u must be vacuumed before %d more multixact members are used", + MultiXactState->offsetStopLimit - nextOffset + nmembers, Thanks, Amit
Robins, On 2015/10/29 10:40, Robins wrote: > Hi, > > Was reviewing recent commits, and it seems the following commit adds an > extra line to some comments. Just wanted to cross-check if that was > intentional. > > Commit: http://goo.gl/zxA00l > Pre-Commit: http://goo.gl/2DpLxi > Post-Commit: http://goo.gl/eKcNm3 You can see a minor change in the "extra line" - member vs. members in the first and second version, respectively, of essentially the same message. errmsg_plural() function determines whether to output the singular version or the plural based on numeric value of the first variadic argument passed to it. For example, if "%d" in the formatted output turns out be 1, "... 1 multixact members ..." in the output message sounds awkward. So does "... 10 multixact member". Hence the committed change. Thanks, Amit
On 29 October 2015 at 15:35, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
errmsg_plural() function determines whether to output the singular version
or the plural
Duh. Thanks Amit!
Should have noticed the function-name change.
Should have noticed the function-name change.
--
Robins Tharakan