Thread: Commitfest progress
Hi all It looks like the commitfest is making very slow progress. At this point it strikes me that it may be time to look for a line to draw between 9.3 and post-9.3 work, defer all post-9.3 work, and then get the rest into shape. As I stepped up to work on the CF and then became immediately swamped in other work I bear some of the responsibility for not keeping things rolling. There's been quite a lot of progress, in that we're down from over 90 open patches to less than 50, but 50 is still a lot of patches. Right now most work is awaiting comprehensive review. A smaller proportion are waiting to author and are likely to be bumped to the next version; it's the stuff waiting for review that seems most pressing. It'd be really good if anyone with a patch in the CF could follow up with an opinion on its readiness and, if appropriate, push it to the next CF. I'll be going through the patch list and following up with my own summaries, but I remain pretty swamped so it'll be a trickle rather than a flood. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
> As I stepped up to work on the CF and then became immediately swamped in > other work I bear some of the responsibility for not keeping things > rolling. Just FYI, this is exactly why I wanted a 2nd CF manager for this CF. > It'd be really good if anyone with a patch in the CF could follow up > with an opinion on its readiness and, if appropriate, push it to the > next CF. I'll be going through the patch list and following up with my > own summaries, but I remain pretty swamped so it'll be a trickle rather > than a flood. I'll try to find time this weekend to go through the pending patches and check status. I'll start at the bottom of the list and you can start at the top. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
On 03/02/2013 02:36 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> As I stepped up to work on the CF and then became immediately swamped in >> other work I bear some of the responsibility for not keeping things >> rolling. > Just FYI, this is exactly why I wanted a 2nd CF manager for this CF. > >> It'd be really good if anyone with a patch in the CF could follow up >> with an opinion on its readiness and, if appropriate, push it to the >> next CF. I'll be going through the patch list and following up with my >> own summaries, but I remain pretty swamped so it'll be a trickle rather >> than a flood. > I'll try to find time this weekend to go through the pending patches and > check status. I'll start at the bottom of the list and you can start at > the top. Works for me, since I haven't been able to find time for it during the week. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
> Works for me, since I haven't been able to find time for it during the > week. Set aside a couple hours to deal with it this AM, foiled because my community account is broken. Grrr. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
On 03/03/2013 08:37 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> Works for me, since I haven't been able to find time for it during the >> week. > > Set aside a couple hours to deal with it this AM, foiled because my > community account is broken. Grrr. we might be able to fix this if you could tell us what exactly the problem is? Stefan
On 03/03/2013 11:58 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > On 03/03/2013 08:37 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> >>> Works for me, since I haven't been able to find time for it during the >>> week. >> >> Set aside a couple hours to deal with it this AM, foiled because my >> community account is broken. Grrr. > > we might be able to fix this if you could tell us what exactly the > problem is? Already sent you private email. Figured the web team would be offline by now, though ... -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
On 1 March 2013 18:36, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >> As I stepped up to work on the CF and then became immediately swamped in >> other work I bear some of the responsibility for not keeping things >> rolling. > > Just FYI, this is exactly why I wanted a 2nd CF manager for this CF. Where was that discussed, and who objected to the 2nd CF manager? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
> Where was that discussed, and who objected to the 2nd CF manager? It was discussed when Craig volunteered. I suggested two CF managers, two people (and Craig) said no, and nobody supported the idea. So I dropped it. It's a bit late now, but we've learned that having only one CF manager for the last CF was the wrong choice. We'll know better next year. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
On 03/05/2013 02:06 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> Where was that discussed, and who objected to the 2nd CF manager? > It was discussed when Craig volunteered. I suggested two CF managers, > two people (and Craig) said no, and nobody supported the idea. So I > dropped it. If I said no I was wrong to do so. I don't remember that, but that's not unheard of for me. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services