Thread: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove prepared transactions from main isolation test schedule.
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove prepared transactions from main isolation test schedule.
From
Tom Lane
Date:
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Remove prepared transactions from main isolation test schedule. > There is no point in running this test when prepared transactions are disabled, > which is the default. New make targets that include the test are provided. This > will save some useless waste of cycles on buildfarm machines. Having done that, shouldn't we remove prepared-transactions_1.out (the "expected" file for the prepared-transactions-disabled case)? Having a megabyte-sized test file for that case has always seemed pretty wasteful to me. Now that the test won't be run unless intentionally selected, it seems like people who are using it would expect it to actually test prepared transactions --- so having it "pass" when they're disabled seems wrong. regards, tom lane
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove prepared transactions from main isolation test schedule.
From
Andrew Dunstan
Date:
On 07/20/2012 04:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> Remove prepared transactions from main isolation test schedule. >> There is no point in running this test when prepared transactions are disabled, >> which is the default. New make targets that include the test are provided. This >> will save some useless waste of cycles on buildfarm machines. > Having done that, shouldn't we remove prepared-transactions_1.out (the > "expected" file for the prepared-transactions-disabled case)? > > Having a megabyte-sized test file for that case has always seemed pretty > wasteful to me. Now that the test won't be run unless intentionally > selected, it seems like people who are using it would expect it to > actually test prepared transactions --- so having it "pass" when they're > disabled seems wrong. > > Good point. Will do. cheers andrew