Thread: Mismatch of relation names: pg_toast.pg_toast_nnn during pg_upgrade from 8.4 to 9.1
Mismatch of relation names: pg_toast.pg_toast_nnn during pg_upgrade from 8.4 to 9.1
From
Jamie Fox
Date:
Hi - I've had no problem upgrading copies our qa databases (which are backed up and restored with pg_dump/pg_restore) but have run into the same problem each time I try to upgrade a copy of our production database (backed up and restored via PITR). After verifying a successful restore and vacuum analyze, I ran a successful pg_upgrade check run with: pg_upgrade -b /usr/local/pgsql-8.4.2/bin -B /usr/local/pgsql-9.1.0/bin -c -d /data/pgsql/prod-84 -D /data/pgsql/prod-91 -G /home/postgres/pg_upgrade_prod.check.debug -k -l /home/postgres/pg_upgrade_prod.check.log -p 5435 -P 5436 -v Then when I ran the actual pg_upgrade: pg_upgrade -b /usr/local/pgsql-8.4.2/bin -B /usr/local/pgsql-9.1.0/bin -d /data/pgsql/prod-84 -D /data/pgsql/prod-91 -G /home/postgres/pg_upgrade_prod.debug -k -l /home/postgres/pg_upgrade_prod.log -p 5435 -P 5436 -v It fails at this stage: Restoring user relation files linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2613 to /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12570 linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2683 to /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12572 Mismatch of relation names: database "prod1", old rel pg_toast.pg_toast_54542379, new rel pg_toast.pg_toast_16735 Failure, exiting These are the log files generated: -rw-rw-r-- 1 postgres postgres 0 Sep 27 12:47 pg_upgrade_prod.check.debug -rw-rw-r-- 1 postgres postgres 8524 Sep 27 13:27 pg_upgrade_prod.check.log -rw-rw-r-- 1postgres postgres 0 Sep 27 13:31 pg_upgrade_prod.debug -rw-rw-r-- 1 postgres postgres 2374 Sep 27 14:12 pg_upgrade_dump_globals.sql -rw-rw-r-- 1 postgres postgres 257696 Sep 27 14:12 pg_upgrade_dump_db.sql -rw-rw-r-- 1 postgrespostgres 260092 Sep 27 14:12 pg_upgrade_dump_all.sql -rw-rw-r-- 1 postgres postgres 75413 Sep 27 14:12 pg_upgrade_prod.log I don't see any helpful (to me) explanation within them, but after some searching ran across this comment in the relevant section of source: 00059 /* 00060 * In pre-8.4, TOAST table names change during CLUSTER; in >= 8.4 00061 * TOAST relation names always use heap table oids, hence we cannot 00062 * check relation names when upgrading from pre-8.4. 00063 */ At this point I still don't understand the underlying issue. Our databases were migrated in place (linked) with pg_migrator from 8.3 to 8.4 could that be the cause or related? Where would you recommend I look to discover a cause and hopefully a solution? Thanks in advance, Jamie
Re: Mismatch of relation names: pg_toast.pg_toast_nnn during pg_upgrade from 8.4 to 9.1
From
Peter Eisentraut
Date:
On tis, 2011-09-27 at 16:19 -0700, Jamie Fox wrote: > > It fails at this stage: > > Restoring user relation files > linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2613 to > /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12570 > linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2683 to > /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12572 > Mismatch of relation names: database "prod1", old rel > pg_toast.pg_toast_54542379, new rel pg_toast.pg_toast_16735 > Failure, exiting This issue is known and a fix is currently being discussed.
Re: Mismatch of relation names: pg_toast.pg_toast_nnn during pg_upgrade from 8.4 to 9.1
From
Jamie Fox
Date:
Thanks, I'm following the thread "pg_upgrade automatic testing" and will try the patch just detailed there. Jamie On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > On tis, 2011-09-27 at 16:19 -0700, Jamie Fox wrote: >> >> It fails at this stage: >> >> Restoring user relation files >> linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2613 to >> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12570 >> linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2683 to >> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12572 >> Mismatch of relation names: database "prod1", old rel >> pg_toast.pg_toast_54542379, new rel pg_toast.pg_toast_16735 >> Failure, exiting > > This issue is known and a fix is currently being discussed. > >
Re: Mismatch of relation names: pg_toast.pg_toast_nnn during pg_upgrade from 8.4 to 9.1
From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
Jamie Fox wrote: > Thanks, I'm following the thread "pg_upgrade automatic testing" and > will try the patch just detailed there. I have applied the patch to head and 9.1.X. We still have a win32 bug to fix. It is a shame I was not able to fix these before 9.1.1 was released. :-( --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > > On tis, 2011-09-27 at 16:19 -0700, Jamie Fox wrote: > >> > >> It fails at this stage: > >> > >> ? ? Restoring user relation files > >> ? ? linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2613 to > >> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12570 > >> ? ? linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2683 to > >> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12572 > >> ? ? Mismatch of relation names: database "prod1", old rel > >> pg_toast.pg_toast_54542379, new rel pg_toast.pg_toast_16735 > >> ? ? Failure, exiting > > > > This issue is known and a fix is currently being discussed. > > > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Re: Mismatch of relation names: pg_toast.pg_toast_nnn during pg_upgrade from 8.4 to 9.1
From
Jamie Fox
Date:
I regret that as a part-timer recently brought back on here I didn't get an opportunity to test this earlier. The upgrade with the patch worked fine on my first attempt. Thanks again, Jamie On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Jamie Fox wrote: >> Thanks, I'm following the thread "pg_upgrade automatic testing" and >> will try the patch just detailed there. > > I have applied the patch to head and 9.1.X. We still have a win32 bug > to fix. It is a shame I was not able to fix these before 9.1.1 was > released. :-( > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >> > On tis, 2011-09-27 at 16:19 -0700, Jamie Fox wrote: >> >> >> >> It fails at this stage: >> >> >> >> ? ? Restoring user relation files >> >> ? ? linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2613 to >> >> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12570 >> >> ? ? linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2683 to >> >> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12572 >> >> ? ? Mismatch of relation names: database "prod1", old rel >> >> pg_toast.pg_toast_54542379, new rel pg_toast.pg_toast_16735 >> >> ? ? Failure, exiting >> > >> > This issue is known and a fix is currently being discussed. >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) >> To make changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > > -- > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com > > + It's impossible for everything to be true. + >
Re: Mismatch of relation names: pg_toast.pg_toast_nnn during pg_upgrade from 8.4 to 9.1
From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
Jamie Fox wrote: > I regret that as a part-timer recently brought back on here I didn't > get an opportunity to test this earlier. The upgrade with the patch > worked fine on my first attempt. Great. Thanks for the report, and sorry for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks again, > > Jamie > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Jamie Fox wrote: > >> Thanks, I'm following the thread "pg_upgrade automatic testing" and > >> will try the patch just detailed there. > > > > I have applied the patch to head and 9.1.X. ?We still have a win32 bug > > to fix. ?It is a shame I was not able to fix these before 9.1.1 was > > released. ?:-( > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > >> > On tis, 2011-09-27 at 16:19 -0700, Jamie Fox wrote: > >> >> > >> >> It fails at this stage: > >> >> > >> >> ? ? Restoring user relation files > >> >> ? ? linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2613 to > >> >> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12570 > >> >> ? ? linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2683 to > >> >> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12572 > >> >> ? ? Mismatch of relation names: database "prod1", old rel > >> >> pg_toast.pg_toast_54542379, new rel pg_toast.pg_toast_16735 > >> >> ? ? Failure, exiting > >> > > >> > This issue is known and a fix is currently being discussed. > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > >> To make changes to your subscription: > >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > > > > -- > > ?Bruce Momjian ?<bruce@momjian.us> ? ? ? ?http://momjian.us > > ?EnterpriseDB ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? http://enterprisedb.com > > > > ?+ It's impossible for everything to be true. + > > -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +