Jamie Fox wrote:
> Thanks, I'm following the thread "pg_upgrade automatic testing" and
> will try the patch just detailed there.
I have applied the patch to head and 9.1.X. We still have a win32 bug
to fix. It is a shame I was not able to fix these before 9.1.1 was
released. :-(
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > On tis, 2011-09-27 at 16:19 -0700, Jamie Fox wrote:
> >>
> >> It fails at this stage:
> >>
> >> ? ? Restoring user relation files
> >> ? ? linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2613 to
> >> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12570
> >> ? ? linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2683 to
> >> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12572
> >> ? ? Mismatch of relation names: database "prod1", old rel
> >> pg_toast.pg_toast_54542379, new rel pg_toast.pg_toast_16735
> >> ? ? Failure, exiting
> >
> > This issue is known and a fix is currently being discussed.
> >
> >
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
