Thread: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Widen the money type to 64 bits.
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007 21:04:09 -0800 (PST) Jeremy Drake <pgsql@jdrake.com> wrote: > This commit message is rather old, I remarked on its absence earlier, but > better late than never I guess ;) Not sure what you mean. I just committed it recently. I held off until after the release as requested. What do you mean by "old?" -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > On Sun, 7 Jan 2007 21:04:09 -0800 (PST) > Jeremy Drake <pgsql@jdrake.com> wrote: > > This commit message is rather old, I remarked on its absence earlier, but > > better late than never I guess ;) > > Not sure what you mean. I just committed it recently. I held off > until after the release as requested. What do you mean by "old?" You committed it five days ago, because the date on the email was Jan 2, but it only arrived today. It should have appeard within minutes of the commit. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
> > > This commit message is rather old, I remarked on its absence earlier, but > > > better late than never I guess ;) > > > > Not sure what you mean. I just committed it recently. I held off > > until after the release as requested. What do you mean by "old?" > > You committed it five days ago, because the date on the email was Jan 2, > but it only arrived today. It should have appeard within minutes of the > commit. > i'm sure it got stuck in the maia filter (happens all the time with delays of a couple of hours up to several days) or inthe moderator steve (if the sender was'nt on the list allow. can happen since it was a long time since he last committed). check the headers if you still havethe original mail around to see where it stuck. /Magnus
"Magnus Hagander" <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> i'm sure it got stuck in the maia filter (happens all the time with
> delays of a couple of hours up to several days) or in the moderator
> steve (if the sender was'nt on the list allow. can happen since it was
> a long time since he last committed).
D'Arcy hasn't committed anything since [ checks CVS history... ]
2003-02-27, so I'm betting on theory B. But can we change that setup
for the -committers list? Any currently-authorized committer should be
whitelisted whether he's committed anything recently or not.
regards, tom lane