Thread: Re: [PATCHES] Last infomask bit

Re: [PATCHES] Last infomask bit

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> .... I believe it would actually be even better to combine the t_natts and
> t_infomask fields to a single 32-bit infomask field.

That's not happening, because the alignment is wrong ...unless maybe
we switch this field to fall before t_ctid, but that would screw up
the MinimalTuple hack.

            regards, tom lane