Re: [PATCHES] Last infomask bit - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Last infomask bit
Date
Msg-id 15510.1168008504@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> .... I believe it would actually be even better to combine the t_natts and
> t_infomask fields to a single 32-bit infomask field.

That's not happening, because the alignment is wrong ...unless maybe
we switch this field to fall before t_ctid, but that would screw up
the MinimalTuple hack.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] wal_checksum = on (default) | off
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Deadline-Based Vacuum Delay