Thread: buildfarm failures in ECPG-Check

It looks like something broke the ECPG-Check recently.  A number of
buildfarm members are failing.

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, PG Build Farm wrote:

>
>
> The PGBuildfarm member mongoose had the following event on branch HEAD:
>
> Failed at Stage: ECPG-Check
>
> The snapshot timestamp for the build that triggered this notification is: 2006-10-03 22:30:01
>
> The specs of this machine are:
> OS:  Gentoo / 1.6.14
> Arch: i686
> Comp: icc / 9.0.032
>
> For more information, see http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=mongoose&br=HEAD
>
>

-- 
Lewis's Law of Travel:The first piece of luggage out of the chute doesn't belong toanyone, ever.

Jeremy Drake <pgsql@jdrake.com> writes:
> It looks like something broke the ECPG-Check recently.  A number of
> buildfarm members are failing.

Looks like blow-back from the recent change in default GUC parameters.

However, I think "update the expected output" is the wrong answer,
because what we are looking at here is evidence that the ecpg checks
will fail anyway against an installed system with nondefault settings.
That test needs to be modified so that it doesn't depend on the value
of any GUC parameter that it hasn't set for itself.
        regards, tom lane

On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:54:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Looks like blow-back from the recent change in default GUC parameters.
> 
> However, I think "update the expected output" is the wrong answer,

I completely agree and thus changed this example to only show variable
settings of variable the program sets itself.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!