Re: buildfarm failures in ECPG-Check - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: buildfarm failures in ECPG-Check
Date
Msg-id 25427.1159916055@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to buildfarm failures in ECPG-Check  (Jeremy Drake <pgsql@jdrake.com>)
Responses Re: buildfarm failures in ECPG-Check  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jeremy Drake <pgsql@jdrake.com> writes:
> It looks like something broke the ECPG-Check recently.  A number of
> buildfarm members are failing.

Looks like blow-back from the recent change in default GUC parameters.

However, I think "update the expected output" is the wrong answer,
because what we are looking at here is evidence that the ecpg checks
will fail anyway against an installed system with nondefault settings.
That test needs to be modified so that it doesn't depend on the value
of any GUC parameter that it hasn't set for itself.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: mark@mark.mielke.cc
Date:
Subject: Re: PG qsort vs. Solaris
Next
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: cvsweb.cgi missing colors