Thread: Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Patch included to implement xlog switching, using an xlog record
> "processing instruction" and forcibly moving xlog pointers.

Just to be clear --- does this fully supersede your draft patch of
27-July, or is that still on the table too?
        regards, tom lane

On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 18:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Patch included to implement xlog switching, using an xlog record
> > "processing instruction" and forcibly moving xlog pointers.
> 
> Just to be clear --- does this fully supersede your draft patch of
> 27-July, or is that still on the table too?

Sorry for lack of clarity.

This patch supersedes the draft patch of 27 July, which should have been
marked more clearly as WIP.

--  Simon Riggs              EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com