Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Date
Msg-id 1154689956.2592.1021.camel@holly
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 18:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Patch included to implement xlog switching, using an xlog record
> > "processing instruction" and forcibly moving xlog pointers.
> 
> Just to be clear --- does this fully supersede your draft patch of
> 27-July, or is that still on the table too?

Sorry for lack of clarity.

This patch supersedes the draft patch of 27 July, which should have been
marked more clearly as WIP.

--  Simon Riggs              EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Katsuhiko Okano
Date:
Subject: Re: LWLock statistics collector (was: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2)
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status