Thread: cvsup binaries?

The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds 
of CVSup:

http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/cvsup.html

Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps 
they are well-hidden).

-Neil

Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds 
> of CVSup:
> Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps 
> they are well-hidden).

If they are still there, they're probably exceedingly out of date :-(
        regards, tom lane

Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> 
>>The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds 
>>of CVSup:
>>Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps 
>>they are well-hidden).
> 
> 
> If they are still there, they're probably exceedingly out of date :-(
> 

Although listed as RH9, the ones at http://www.joeconway.com/ work on my 
FC2 machine. They don't work on FC3 however, and I haven't gotten around 
to trying to rebuild on FC3.

Joe

Joe Conway said:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
>>
>>>The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary
>>>builds  of CVSup:
>>>Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but
>>>perhaps  they are well-hidden).
>>
>>
>> If they are still there, they're probably exceedingly out of date :-(
>>
>
> Although listed as RH9, the ones at http://www.joeconway.com/ work on
> my  FC2 machine. They don't work on FC3 however, and I haven't gotten
> around  to trying to rebuild on FC3.
>

Or look for FC3 RPMs in Fedora Extras for i386 and ppc (but not x86_64).

cheers

andrew

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi,

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Joe Conway wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
>> 
>>> The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds of 
>>> CVSup:
>>> Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps 
>>> they are well-hidden).
>> 
>> 
>> If they are still there, they're probably exceedingly out of date :-(
>
> Although listed as RH9, the ones at http://www.joeconway.com/ work on my FC2 
> machine. They don't work on FC3 however, and I haven't gotten around to 
> trying to rebuild on FC3.

If anyone's interested, I've rebuilt the packages for RHEL ES 3:

http://www.gunduz.org/rpms/cvsup/

Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ 
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com                         http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCMvyWtl86P3SPfQ4RAl+9AKDJ6kL21t+f+Kehz8CVGcdrQokLwACfaB2r
ShLh063uyOHiuY35wpTIBG4=
=OzRi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Joe Conway wrote:
>> Although listed as RH9, the ones at http://www.joeconway.com/ work on 
>> my FC2 machine. They don't work on FC3 however, and I haven't gotten 
>> around to trying to rebuild on FC3.
> 
> If anyone's interested, I've rebuilt the packages for RHEL ES 3:
> 
> http://www.gunduz.org/rpms/cvsup/

I just posted some FC3 i386 packages.

Joe