Re: cvsup binaries? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Devrim GUNDUZ
Subject Re: cvsup binaries?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.61.0503121627400.22890@emo.org.tr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cvsup binaries?  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: cvsup binaries?  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi,

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Joe Conway wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
>> 
>>> The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds of 
>>> CVSup:
>>> Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps 
>>> they are well-hidden).
>> 
>> 
>> If they are still there, they're probably exceedingly out of date :-(
>
> Although listed as RH9, the ones at http://www.joeconway.com/ work on my FC2 
> machine. They don't work on FC3 however, and I haven't gotten around to 
> trying to rebuild on FC3.

If anyone's interested, I've rebuilt the packages for RHEL ES 3:

http://www.gunduz.org/rpms/cvsup/

Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ 
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com                         http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCMvyWtl86P3SPfQ4RAl+9AKDJ6kL21t+f+Kehz8CVGcdrQokLwACfaB2r
ShLh063uyOHiuY35wpTIBG4=
=OzRi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: cvsup binaries?
Next
From: Nicolai Tufar
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail