Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nicolai Tufar
Subject Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Date
Msg-id d809293905031207005ec9216c@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail  (Nicolai Tufar <ntufar@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests
List pgsql-hackers
Resubmission of yesterday's patch so that it would
cont conflict with Bruce's cvs commit. Pleas apply.

Best regards,
Nicolai.


On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 01:58:15 +0200, Nicolai Tufar <ntufar@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:21:41 -0500 (EST), Bruce Momjian
> <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> > > The CVS-tip implementation is fundamentally broken and won't work even
> > > for our internal uses.  I've not wasted time complaining about it
> > > because I thought we were going to replace it.  If we can't find a
> > > usable replacement then we're going to have to put a lot of effort
> > > into fixing what's there.  On the whole I think the effort would be
> > > better spent importing someone else's solution.
> >
> > Oh, so our existing implementation doesn't even meet our needs. OK.
>
> Which made me wander why did I not aggree with
> Tom Lane's suggestion to make do three passes
> instead of two. Tom was right, as usual. It happened to
> be much easier than I expected. The patch is attached.
> Please apply.
>
> Tom, what do you think? Will it be fine with you?
>
> Best regards,
> Nicolai
>
>
>

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Devrim GUNDUZ
Date:
Subject: Re: cvsup binaries?
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: cvsup binaries?