Thread: split_part bug
PostgreSQL 8.0b4 as released. select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z',' ',1); select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z',' ',2); select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z',' ',3); select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z',' ',4); should return a b c, and d returns a, null, null, null select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z',' ',2); select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z',' ',3); select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z',' ',4); should return b c, and d returns b, c, null ... John
John Hansen <john@geeknet.com.au> writes: > PostgreSQL 8.0b4 as released. > select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y > z',' ',1); > select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y > z',' ',2); > select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y > z',' ',3); > select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y > z',' ',4); > should return a b c, and d > returns a, null, null, null Works fine for me. What encoding/locale are you using? regards, tom lane
> Works fine for me. What encoding/locale are you using? unicode / c
John Hansen <john@geeknet.com.au> writes: >> Works fine for me. What encoding/locale are you using? > unicode / c [ shrug... ] Works fine for me in unicode, too. u=# select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z',' ',1);split_part ------------a (1 row) u=# select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z',' ',2);split_part ------------b (1 row) u=# select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z',' ',3);split_part ------------c (1 row) u=# select split_part('a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z',' ',4);split_part ------------d (1 row) regards, tom lane
> [ shrug... ] Works fine for me in unicode, too. never mind me,. I broke it..... seems my assumption that UCS2 == UTF16 was way off.... ... john