While adding schema support to the JDBC Driver, I came across a query
which occasionally generates some spectacularly bad plans. I have
attached the query and explain analyze outputs against today's cvs head
for queries that take between 9 and 845941 msec. In the JDBC Driver I
will specify a reasonable join order using explicit JOINs, but I thought
someone might be interested in a test case for the optimizer.
Kris Jurka
The query tries to determine what foreign keys exists between the
following tables.
create table people (id int4 primary key, name text);
create table policy (id int4 primary key, name text);
create table users (id int4 primary key, people_id int4,
policy_id int4,
CONSTRAINT people FOREIGN KEY (people_id) references people(id),
constraint policy FOREIGN KEY (policy_id) references policy(id));
SELECT DISTINCT n.nspname as pnspname, n2.nspname as fnspname,
c.relname as prelname, c2.relname as frelname,
t.tgconstrname, a.attnum as keyseq, ic.relname as fkeyname,
t.tgdeferrable, t.tginitdeferred, t.tgnargs,t.tgargs,
p1.proname as updaterule, p2.proname as deleterule
FROM pg_catalog.pg_namespace n,
pg_catalog.pg_namespace n2,
pg_catalog.pg_trigger t,
pg_catalog.pg_trigger t1,
pg_catalog.pg_class c,
pg_catalog.pg_class c2,
pg_catalog.pg_class ic,
pg_catalog.pg_proc p1,
pg_catalog.pg_proc p2,
pg_catalog.pg_index i,
pg_catalog.pg_attribute a
WHERE
(t.tgrelid=c.oid AND t.tgisconstraint AND t.tgconstrrelid=c2.oid
AND t.tgfoid=p1.oid and p1.proname like 'RI\_FKey\_%\_upd')
AND
(t1.tgrelid=c.oid and t1.tgisconstraint and t1.tgconstrrelid=c2.oid
AND t1.tgfoid=p2.oid and p2.proname like 'RI\_FKey\_%\_del')
AND i.indrelid=c.oid
AND i.indexrelid=ic.oid
AND ic.oid=a.attrelid
AND i.indisprimary
AND c.relnamespace = n.oid
AND c2.relnamespace=n2.oid
AND c2.relname='users'
ORDER BY prelname,keyseq
;
Unique (cost=1.06..1.10 rows=1 width=594) (actual time=845786.00..845786.00 rows=2 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=1.06..1.07 rows=1 width=594) (actual time=845786.00..845786.00 rows=2 loops=1)
Sort Key: c.relname, a.attnum, n.nspname, n2.nspname, c2.relname, t.tgconstrname, ic.relname, t.tgdeferrable,
t.tginitdeferred,t.tgnargs, t.tgargs, p1.proname, p2.proname
-> Merge Join (cost=1.03..1.05 rows=1 width=594) (actual time=844522. 00..845786.00 rows=2 loops=1)
Merge Cond: ("outer".tgconstrrelid = "inner".tgconstrrelid)
Join Filter: (("inner".tgfoid = "outer".oid) AND ("inner".tgrelid = "outer".oid))
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..27709.41 rows=1 width=510) (actual time=844522.00..845786.00 rows=12
loops=1)
Join Filter: (("inner".indexrelid = "outer".oid) AND ("inner".indrelid = "outer".oid))
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..27706.67 rows=1 width=502) (actual time=843375.00..843954.00
rows=10620loops=1)
Join Filter: (("inner".tgconstrrelid = "outer".oid) AND ("outer".relnamespace =
"inner".oid))
-> Index Scan using pg_class_oid_index on pg_class c2 (cost=0.00..15.67 rows=1 width=72)
(actualtime=1.00..1.00 rows=1 loops=1)
Filter: (relname = 'users'::name)
-> Materialize (cost=27690.93..27690.93 rows=4 width=430) (actual
time=843374.00..843781.00rows=42480 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..27690.93 rows=4 width=430) (actual
time=614674.00..843125.00rows=42480 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..27689.85 rows=1 width=362) (actual
time=614674.00..842368.00rows=10620 loops=1)
Join Filter: (("outer".tgfoid = "inner".oid) AND ("outer".tgrelid =
"inner".oid))
-> Seq Scan on pg_trigger t1 (cost=0.00..1.02 rows=1 width=12) (actual
time=0.00..1.00rows=6 loops=1)
Filter: tgisconstraint
-> Materialize (cost=26180.37..26180.37 rows=100564 width=350) (actual
time=83492.50..135359.33rows=3637350 loops=6)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..26180.37 rows=100564 width=350) (actual
time=68978.00..481414.00rows=3637350 loops=1)
Join Filter: ("inner".relnamespace = "outer".oid)
-> Seq Scan on pg_namespace n (cost=0.00..1.04 rows=4
width=68)(actual time=0.00..0.00 rows=4 loops=1)
-> Materialize (cost=5287.78..5287.78 rows=100564 width=282)
(actualtime=17273.75..110243.25 rows=3637350 loops=4)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..5287.78 rows=100564
width=282)(actual time=106.00..45489.00 rows=3637350 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..843.50 rows=811
width=210)(actual time=106.00..557.00 rows=26550 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using
pg_proc_proname_args_nsp_indexon pg_proc p2 (cost=0.00..5.97 rows=1 width=68) (actual time=0.00..1.00 rows=5 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((proname >= 'RI'::name)
AND(proname < 'RJ'::name))
Filter: (proname ~~
'RI_FKey_%_del'::text)
-> Materialize (cost=829.42..829.42
rows=811width=142) (actual time=21.20..58.60 rows=5310 loops=5)
-> Merge Join (cost=0.00..829.42
rows=811width=142) (actual time=0.00..87.00 rows=5310 loops=1)
Merge Cond: ("outer".oid =
"inner".attrelid)
-> Nested Loop
(cost=0.00..757.44rows=124 width=136) (actual time=0.00..27.00 rows=822 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using
pg_class_oid_indexon pg_class ic (cost=0.00..15.36 rows=124 width=68) (actual time=0.00..1.00 rows=137 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using
pg_proc_proname_args_nsp_indexon pg_proc p1 (cost=0.00..5.97 rows=1 width=68) (actual time=0.00..0.17 rows=6 loops=137)
Index Cond:
((proname>= 'RI'::name) AND (proname < 'RJ'::name))
Filter: (proname ~~
'RI_FKey_%_upd'::text)
-> Index Scan using
pg_attribute_relid_attnum_indexon pg_attribute a (cost=0.00..59.51 rows=811 width=6) (actual time=0.00..32.00
rows=5305loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on pg_class c (cost=0.00..4.24
rows=124width=72) (actual time=0.01..0.96 rows=137 loops=26550)
-> Seq Scan on pg_namespace n2 (cost=0.00..1.04 rows=4 width=68) (actual
time=0.01..0.02rows=4 loops=10620)
-> Seq Scan on pg_index i (cost=0.00..2.61 rows=9 width=8) (actual time=0.06..0.14 rows=15
loops=10620)
Filter: indisprimary
-> Sort (cost=1.03..1.03 rows=1 width=84) (actual time=0.00..0.00 rows=39 loops=1)
Sort Key: t.tgconstrrelid
-> Seq Scan on pg_trigger t (cost=0.00..1.02 rows=1 width=84) (actual time=0.00..0.00 rows=6
loops=1)
Filter: tgisconstraint
Total runtime: 845941.00 msec
(46 rows)
Unique (cost=1.06..1.10 rows=1 width=594) (actual time=7.00..7.00 rows=2 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=1.06..1.07 rows=1 width=594) (actual time=7.00..7.00 rows=2 loops=1)
Sort Key: c.relname, a.attnum, n.nspname, n2.nspname, c2.relname, t.tgconstrname, ic.relname, t.tgdeferrable,
t.tginitdeferred,t.tgnargs, t.tgargs, p1.proname, p2.proname
-> Merge Join (cost=1.03..1.05 rows=1 width=594) (actual time=5.00..6.00 rows=2 loops=1)
Merge Cond: ("outer".tgconstrrelid = "inner".tgconstrrelid)
Join Filter: (("outer".indrelid = "inner".tgrelid) AND ("inner".tgfoid = "outer".oid))
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..85.31 rows=1 width=510) (actual time=4.00..6.00 rows=12 loops=1)
Join Filter: ("inner".relnamespace = "outer".oid)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..63.49 rows=4 width=438) (actual time=3.00..4.00 rows=48 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..62.41 rows=1 width=370) (actual time=3.00..3.00 rows=12
loops=1)
Join Filter: (("inner".tgconstrrelid = "outer".oid) AND ("outer".relnamespace =
"inner".oid))
-> Index Scan using pg_class_oid_index on pg_class c2 (cost=0.00..15.67 rows=1
width=72)(actual time=1.00..1.00 rows=1 loops=1)
Filter: (relname = 'users'::name)
-> Materialize (cost=46.67..46.67 rows=4 width=298) (actual time=2.00..2.00 rows=48
loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..46.67 rows=4 width=298) (actual time=1.00..2.00
rows=48loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..45.59 rows=1 width=230) (actual
time=1.00..1.00rows=12 loops=1)
Join Filter: ("inner".tgfoid = "outer".oid)
-> Index Scan using pg_proc_proname_args_nsp_index on pg_proc p2
(cost=0.00..5.97rows=1 width=68) (actual time=0.00..0.00 rows=5 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((proname > = 'RI'::name) AND (proname <
'RJ'::name))
Filter: (proname ~~ 'RI _FKey_%_del'::text)
-> Materialize (cost=39.54..39.54 rows=7 width=162) (actual
time=0.20..0.20rows=36 loops=5)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..39.54 rows=7 width=162) (actual
time=1.00..1.00rows=36 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using pg_proc_proname_args_nsp_index on
pg_procp1 (cost=0.00..5.97 rows=1 width=68) (actual time=0.00..0.00 rows=6 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((proname >= 'RI'::name) AND (proname
<'RJ'::name))
Filter: (proname ~~ 'RI_FKey_%_upd'::text)
-> Materialize (cost=33.50..33.50 rows=7 width=94)
(actualtime=0.17..0.17 rows=6 loops=6)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..33.50 rows=7
width=94)(actual time=1.00..1.00 rows=6 loops=1)
Join Filter: ("outer".oid =
"inner".attrelid)
-> Merge Join (cost=0.00..15.13 rows=1
width=88)(actual time=0.00..0.00 rows=6 loops=1)
Merge Cond: ("outer".indrelid =
"inner".tgrelid)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..58.89
rows=9width=76) (actual time=0.00..0.00 rows=15 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using
pg_index_indrelid_indexon pg_index i (cost=0.00..9.80 rows=9 width=8) (actual time=0.00..0.00 rows=15 loops=1)
Filter: indisprimary
-> Index Scan using
pg_class_oid_indexon pg_class ic (cost=0.00..5.44 rows=1 width=68) (actual time=0.00..0.00 rows=1 loops=15)
Index Cond:
("outer".indexrelid= ic.oid)
-> Index Scan using
pg_trigger_tgrelid_tgname_indexon pg_trigger t1 (cost=0.00..5.27 rows=1 width=12) (actual time=0.00..0.00 rows=6
loops=1)
Filter: tgisconstraint
-> Index Scan using
pg_attribute_relid_attnum_indexon pg_attribute a (cost=0.00..18.29 rows=7 width=6) (actual time=0.00..0.00 rows=1
loops=6)
Index Cond: (a.attrelid =
"outer".indexrelid)
-> Seq Scan on pg_namespace n2 (cost=0.00..1.04 rows=4 width=68) (actual
time=0.00..0.00rows=4 loops=12)
-> Seq Scan on pg_namespace n (cost=0.00..1.04 rows=4 width=68) (actual time=0.08..0.08
rows=4loops=12)
-> Index Scan using pg_class_oid_index on pg_class c (cost=0.00..5.44 rows=1 width=72) (actual
time=0.02..0.04rows=1 loops=48)
Index Cond: ("outer".indrelid = c.oid)
-> Sort (cost=1.03..1.03 rows=1 width=84) (actual time=0.00..0.00 rows=39 loops=1)
Sort Key: t.tgconstrrelid
-> Seq Scan on pg_trigger t (cost=0.00..1.02 rows=1 width=84) (actual time=0.00..0.00 rows=6
loops=1)
Filter: tgisconstraint
Total runtime: 9.00 msec
(48 rows)