Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Thread: Re: Ready for RC1?

Re: Ready for RC1?

From
"Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Yup, going to bundle her first thing when I get up tomorrow (or, rather,
later today, looking at the time *grin*)


On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> AFAIK we are go for 7.2RC1.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>

Re: Ready for RC1?

From
Brent Verner
Date:
[2002-01-19 01:34] Marc G. Fournier said:
| 
| Yup, going to bundle her first thing when I get up tomorrow (or, rather,
| later today, looking at the time *grin*)

Is this rolled yet?  I haven't seen it in any mirrors and haven't
been able to get on ftp.postgresql.org (which I assume is ftp master).

thanks. brent

-- 
"Develop your talent, man, and leave the world something. Records are 
really gifts from people. To think that an artist would love you enough
to share his music with anyone is a beautiful thing."  -- Duane Allman

Re: Ready for RC1?

From
"Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Brent Verner wrote:

> [2002-01-19 01:34] Marc G. Fournier said:
> |
> | Yup, going to bundle her first thing when I get up tomorrow (or, rather,
> | later today, looking at the time *grin*)
>
> Is this rolled yet?  I haven't seen it in any mirrors and haven't
> been able to get on ftp.postgresql.org (which I assume is ftp master).

No ... I've held off waiting on a resolution of the problem that Tom Lane
brought up with the RTLD_* stuff, since if any changes in there are going
in, they should be done *at least* before RC1 ...

Re: Ready for RC1?

From
Tom Lane
Date:
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> No ... I've held off waiting on a resolution of the problem that Tom Lane
> brought up with the RTLD_* stuff, since if any changes in there are going
> in, they should be done *at least* before RC1 ...

I think the consensus is that we should not risk the RTLD_* change now.

I put in a Makefile hack to cure the immediate issue with Red Hat's Tcl
RPMs, so I think we're good to go on RC1.
        regards, tom lane

Re: Ready for RC1?

From
Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Marc G. Fournier writes:

> No ... I've held off waiting on a resolution of the problem that Tom Lane
> brought up with the RTLD_* stuff, since if any changes in there are going
> in, they should be done *at least* before RC1 ...

We're not doing that in this release, AFAIK.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net