Thread: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...
Okay folks ...
We'd like to wrap up an RC1 and get this release happening this
year sometime :) Tom mentioned to me that he has no outstandings left on
his plate ... does anyone else have any *show stoppers* left that need to
be addressed, or can I package things up?
Speak now, or forever hold your piece (where forever is the time
between now and RC1 is packaged) ...
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> Speak now, or forever hold your piece (where forever is the time
> between now and RC1 is packaged) ...
I rather hope it's *NOT* ....
regards, tom lane
* Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> [010320 10:21] wrote: > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > > Speak now, or forever hold your piece (where forever is the time > > between now and RC1 is packaged) ... > > I rather hope it's *NOT* .... And still no LAZY vacuum. *sigh* -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
> We'd like to wrap up an RC1 and get this release happening > this year sometime :) Tom mentioned to me that he has no > outstandings left on his plate ... does anyone else have any > *show stoppers* left that need to be addressed, or can I package > things up? I wonder if anybody tried to stop PG in the time of high write activity with pg_ctl -m immediate stop or power off to see how recovery works..? Vadim
> And still no LAZY vacuum. *sigh* Patch will be available in a few days after release. Sorry, Alfred. Vadim
The Hermit Hacker writes: > We'd like to wrap up an RC1 and get this release happening this > year sometime :) Tom mentioned to me that he has no outstandings left on > his plate ... does anyone else have any *show stoppers* left that need to > be addressed, or can I package things up? I just uploaded new man pages. I'll probably do them once more in a few days to catch all the changes. We need a supported platform list. Let's hear it. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
UnixWare 7, Rel 7.1.1, using UDK FS Compiler FreeBSD 4.[23] LER >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 3/20/01, 1:11:21 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote regarding Re: [HACKERS] Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...: > The Hermit Hacker writes: > > We'd like to wrap up an RC1 and get this release happening this > > year sometime :) Tom mentioned to me that he has no outstandings left on > > his plate ... does anyone else have any *show stoppers* left that need to > > be addressed, or can I package things up? > I just uploaded new man pages. I'll probably do them once more in a few > days to catch all the changes. > We need a supported platform list. Let's hear it. > -- > Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/ > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
BSDI 4.01. [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > UnixWare 7, Rel 7.1.1, using UDK FS Compiler > FreeBSD 4.[23] > > LER > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > On 3/20/01, 1:11:21 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote regarding > Re: [HACKERS] Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...: > > > > The Hermit Hacker writes: > > > > We'd like to wrap up an RC1 and get this release happening this > > > year sometime :) Tom mentioned to me that he has no outstandings left on > > > his plate ... does anyone else have any *show stoppers* left that need to > > > be addressed, or can I package things up? > > > I just uploaded new man pages. I'll probably do them once more in a few > > days to catch all the changes. > > > We need a supported platform list. Let's hear it. > > > -- > > Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/ > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> We need a supported platform list. Let's hear it.
HPUX 10.20 (HP-PA architecture)
Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think)
regards, tom lane
<p><font size="2">Redhat Linux 7.0 (glibc 2.2-12, gcc 2.96-69)</font><p><font size="2">MikeA</font><p><font size="2">-----OriginalMessage-----</font><br /><font size="2">From: Peter Eisentraut</font><br /><font size="2">To: The HermitHacker</font><br /><font size="2">Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org</font><br /><font size="2">Sent: 20/03/01 19:11</font><br/><font size="2">Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...</font><p><font size="2">TheHermit Hacker writes:</font><p><font size="2">> We'd like to wrap up an RC1 and get this release happeningthis</font><br /><font size="2">> year sometime :) Tom mentioned to me that he has no outstandings left</font><br/><font size="2">on</font><br /><font size="2">> his plate ... does anyone else have any *show stoppers*left that need</font><br /><font size="2">to</font><br /><font size="2">> be addressed, or can I package thingsup?</font><p><font size="2">I just uploaded new man pages. I'll probably do them once more in a few</font><br /><fontsize="2">days to catch all the changes.</font><p><font size="2">We need a supported platform list. Let's hear it.</font><p><fontsize="2">-- </font><br /><font size="2">Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net <a href="http://yi.org/peter-e/"target="_blank">http://yi.org/peter-e/</a></font><br /><p><font size="2">---------------------------(endof broadcast)---------------------------</font><br /><font size="2">TIP 2: you canget off all lists at once with the unregister command</font><br /><font size="2"> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere"to majordomo@postgresql.org)</font><code><font size="3"><br /><br /> _________________________________________________________________________<br/> This e-mail and any attachments are confidentialand may also be privileged and/or copyright <br /> material of Intec Telecom Systems PLC (or its affiliated companies).If you are not an <br /> intended or authorised recipient of this e-mail or have received it in error, pleasedelete <br /> it immediately and notify the sender by e-mail. In such a case, reading, reproducing, <br /> printingor further dissemination of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. <br /> Intec Telecom SystemsPLC. does not represent or warrant that an attachment hereto is free <br /> from computer viruses or other defects.The opinions expressed in this e-mail and any <br /> attachments may be those of the author and are not necessarilythose of Intec Telecom <br /> Systems PLC. <br /><br /> This footnote also confirms that this email message hasbeen swept by<br /> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. <br /> __________________________________________________________________________<br/></font></code>
Go here to report or to see the list. http://www.postgresql.org/~vev/regress/ Vince. On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Larry Rosenman wrote: > UnixWare 7, Rel 7.1.1, using UDK FS Compiler > FreeBSD 4.[23] > > LER > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > On 3/20/01, 1:11:21 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote regarding > Re: [HACKERS] Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...: > > > > The Hermit Hacker writes: > > > > We'd like to wrap up an RC1 and get this release happening this > > > year sometime :) Tom mentioned to me that he has no outstandings left on > > > his plate ... does anyone else have any *show stoppers* left that need to > > > be addressed, or can I package things up? > > > I just uploaded new man pages. I'll probably do them once more in a few > > days to catch all the changes. > > > We need a supported platform list. Let's hear it. > > > -- > > Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/ > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl > -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo atPop4 Networking Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com ==========================================================================
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 08:11:21PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > We need a supported platform list. Let's hear it. Linux 2.4.2 (Debian, Woody), glibc 2.2.2, gcc 2.95.3 (from CVS). -Roberto -- +----| http://fslc.usu.edu USU Free Software & GNU/Linux Club|------+ Roberto Mello - Computer Science, USU - http://www.brasileiro.net http://www.sdl.usu.edu - Space Dynamics Lab, Web Developer
> HPUX 10.20 (HP-PA architecture)
Time to drop 9.2 from the list?
> Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think)
What processor? Tatsuo had tested on a 603...
- Thomas
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
>> HPUX 10.20 (HP-PA architecture)
> Time to drop 9.2 from the list?
I don't have it running here anymore. Is there anyone on the list
who can test on HPUX 9?
>> Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think)
> What processor? Tatsuo had tested on a 603...
It's a Powerbook G3 (FireWire model), but I'm not sure which chip is
inside (and Apple's spec sheet isn't too helpful)...
regards, tom lane
> >> Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think)
>
> > What processor? Tatsuo had tested on a 603...
> It's a Powerbook G3 (FireWire model), but I'm not sure which chip is
> inside (and Apple's spec sheet isn't too helpful)...
From what I can tell (which isn't much ;) Apple at least calls the
processor a "G3". Which accounts for why we can't find another
designation.
Not sure where it fits into the lineup I *used* to know about (for
embedded systems) but I don't care. Will refer to it as a "G3" for
now...
- Thomas
> > >> Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think)
> > > What processor? Tatsuo had tested on a 603...
> > It's a Powerbook G3 (FireWire model), but I'm not sure which chip is
> > inside (and Apple's spec sheet isn't too helpful)...
> From what I can tell (which isn't much ;) Apple at least calls the
> processor a "G3". Which accounts for why we can't find another
> designation.
Tatsuo, I have a separate listing for "mklinux" for the 7.0 release. Is
that distro still valid and unique? Or is there a better way to
represent the PPC options under Linux?
- Thomas
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > > >> Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think) > > > > What processor? Tatsuo had tested on a 603... > > > It's a Powerbook G3 (FireWire model), but I'm not sure which chip is > > > inside (and Apple's spec sheet isn't too helpful)... > > From what I can tell (which isn't much ;) Apple at least calls the > > processor a "G3". Which accounts for why we can't find another > > designation. > > Tatsuo, I have a separate listing for "mklinux" for the 7.0 release. Is > that distro still valid and unique? Or is there a better way to > represent the PPC options under Linux? mklinux is older Motorola 68k-based systems LinuxPPC is the newer powerPC-based systems -- Dominic J. Eidson "Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.the-infinite.org/ http://www.the-infinite.org/~dominic/
> mklinux is older Motorola 68k-based systems
> LinuxPPC is the newer powerPC-based systems
Hmm. I have mklinux listed as being on the 750. My vague recollection is
that the distinction is between NuBus and PCI machines (not necessarily
in that order), but...
I also vaguely recalled that the distros had merged (or something :/
- Thomas
> Tatsuo, I have a separate listing for "mklinux" for the 7.0 release. Is > that distro still valid and unique? Or is there a better way to > represent the PPC options under Linux? I think MkLinux is completely different from Linux/PPC. Will test RC1 on my MkLiux box soon... -- Tatsuo Ishii
> > Tatsuo, I have a separate listing for "mklinux" for the 7.0 release. Is > > that distro still valid and unique? Or is there a better way to > > represent the PPC options under Linux? > > mklinux is older Motorola 68k-based systems No. MkLinux runs on Power PC based system also. I believe there is a x86 based MkLinux exists somewhere. -- Tatsuo Ishii
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > > >> Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think) > > > > What processor? Tatsuo had tested on a 603... > > > It's a Powerbook G3 (FireWire model), but I'm not sure which chip is > > > inside (and Apple's spec sheet isn't too helpful)... > > From what I can tell (which isn't much ;) Apple at least calls the > > processor a "G3". Which accounts for why we can't find another > > designation. The G3s are the MPC7XX family and the G4s are the MPC7XXX family. All of the ones Mac is currently releasing are MPC7450s.See http://e-www.motorola.com/webapp/sps/prod_cat/taxonomy.jsp?catId=M934309493763 for more details. FWIW. -- Dominic J. Eidson "Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.the-infinite.org/ http://www.the-infinite.org/~dominic/
> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > >> HPUX 10.20 (HP-PA architecture) > > > Time to drop 9.2 from the list? > > I don't have it running here anymore. Is there anyone on the list > who can test on HPUX 9? HP haven't supported 9.X since the end of 1999 on servers, and since earlier than that on workstations. I doubt anyone will expect to see it listed on the PostgreSQL list of supported platforms for 7.1. Regards, Giles
Quoting The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>: > > Okay folks ... > > We'd like to wrap up an RC1 and get this release happening this > year sometime :) Tom mentioned to me that he has no outstandings left > on his plate ... does anyone else have any *show stoppers* left that need > to be addressed, or can I package things up? Nothing that would stop RC1 (I've still got some testing which I'm doing later tonight). > Speak now, or forever hold your piece (where forever is the time > between now and RC1 is packaged) ... I'm surprised it hasn't been out already - being worked to death the last two weeks, I'm still catching up with developments :( ... Peter -- Peter Mount peter@retep.org.uk PostgreSQL JDBC Driver: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/ RetepPDF PDF library for Java: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
Thomas Lockhart writes: > > HPUX 10.20 (HP-PA architecture) > > Time to drop 9.2 from the list? > > > Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think) > > What processor? Tatsuo had tested on a 603... Given that we list "x86", I think we wouldn't care. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
Tatsuo Ishii writes: > > > Tatsuo, I have a separate listing for "mklinux" for the 7.0 release. Is > > > that distro still valid and unique? Or is there a better way to > > > represent the PPC options under Linux? > > > > mklinux is older Motorola 68k-based systems > > No. MkLinux runs on Power PC based system also. I believe there is a > x86 based MkLinux exists somewhere. mkLinux is "micro-kernel" Linux, on top of Mach. Consequentially, it is non-trivially different from any other Linux. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
Time to speak up, I have a HPUX 9.07 system and will test today. Jim > Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > >> HPUX 10.20 (HP-PA architecture) > > > Time to drop 9.2 from the list? > > I don't have it running here anymore. Is there anyone on the list > who can test on HPUX 9? > > >> Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel I think) > > > What processor? Tatsuo had tested on a 603... > > It's a Powerbook G3 (FireWire model), but I'm not sure which chip is > inside (and Apple's spec sheet isn't too helpful)... > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > >
HPUX 9.07 with GCC 2.8.1 fails the regression tests. I will look into this later. I would NOT hold anything up because of this.... Jim > Time to speak up, I have a HPUX 9.07 system and will test today. > > Jim > > > Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > > >> HPUX 10.20 (HP-PA architecture) > > > > > Time to drop 9.2 from the list? > > > > I don't have it running here anymore. Is there anyone on the list > > who can test on HPUX 9? > > > > >> Linux/PPC (LinuxPPC 2000 Q4 distro tested here; 2.2.18 kernel > I think) > > > > > What processor? Tatsuo had tested on a 603... > > > > It's a Powerbook G3 (FireWire model), but I'm not sure which chip is > > inside (and Apple's spec sheet isn't too helpful)... > > > > regards, tom lane > > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)------------------------- -- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > >
$ uname -a OpenBSD mizer 2.8 a#0 i386 P3, default 2.8 install. Problems w/ TCL, but I think it's a local problem. System needs kernel changes as noted at www.crimelabs.net. (shared mem stuff). OBSD-sparc comming soon. - b b. palmer, bpalmer@crimelabs.net pgp: www.crimelabs.net/bpalmer.pgp5