Thread: Should I look elsewhere??

So...
If after recompiling postgres with -g in the CFLAGS and still getting 0x40050768 in ?? ()
in gdb, should I look elsewhere???
                    Thanks                    -Mat
-- 
Mathieu Dube    
Mondo-Live            
www.flipr.com

On Mon, 05 Feb 2001, you wrote:
> You're not backtracing the same core file as before, are you?
???
I dont see what you mean

I build postgresql with -g and then put libpq.a in my project's dir 
all my files are compiled with -g too

the only other thing I use is posix threads 

How do I know what function is supposed to be in the place of ?? that gdb
outputs                            Thanks                -Mat
> 
> The core file produced by something compiled with debug symbols should be
> much nicer to read..
> 
> -Mitch
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mathieu Dube" <mathieu_dube@videotron.ca>
> To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 5:03 PM
> Subject: Should I look elsewhere??
> 
> 
> > So...
> > If after recompiling postgres with -g in the CFLAGS and still getting
> 0x40050768 in ?? ()
> > in gdb, should I look elsewhere???
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Mat
> > --
> > Mathieu Dube
> > Mondo-Live
> > www.flipr.com
> >
-- 
Mathieu Dube    
Mondo-Live            
www.flipr.com

post the rest of the traceback.

0x40* is the address inside some shared library, most likely libc.

full traceback will show what happened before it got to libc

-alex



On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Mathieu Dube wrote:

> So...
> If after recompiling postgres with -g in the CFLAGS and still getting 0x40050768 in ?? ()
> in gdb, should I look elsewhere???
> 
>                         Thanks
>                         -Mat
>