Thread: Any changes in Java and PGSQL 9.4?

Any changes in Java and PGSQL 9.4?

From
Bjørn T Johansen
Date:
Just noticed that a column field of type bigint containing a null, becomes a 0 when retrieving it from the resultset
usingJDBC. 
If I run the same application against my old 9.3 database, the value retrieved is a null....


Regards,

BTJ

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bjørn T Johansen

btj@havleik.no
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone wrote:
"I understand that if you play a Windows CD backwards you hear strange Satanic messages"
To which someone replied:
"It's even worse than that; play it forwards and it installs Windows"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Re: Any changes in Java and PGSQL 9.4?

From
Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Bjørn T Johansen wrote on 18.01.2015 20:20:
> Just noticed that a column field of type bigint containing a null, becomes a 0 when retrieving it from the resultset
usingJDBC. 
> If I run the same application against my old 9.3 database, the value retrieved is a null....
>
>

You need to show us some code.

getInt() or getLong() can never return null because primitives can't be null in Java.






--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



Re: Any changes in Java and PGSQL 9.4?

From
Bjørn T Johansen
Date:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:20:35 +0100
Bjørn T Johansen <btj@havleik.no> wrote:

> Just noticed that a column field of type bigint containing a null, becomes a 0 when retrieving it from the resultset
usingJDBC. 
> If I run the same application against my old 9.3 database, the value retrieved is a null....
>
>
> Regards,
>
> BTJ
>

Sorry, my fault... I tried running against my old database with my workaround to set the value to null..  Maybe it's a
newSpring feature as am using 
a newer version of Spring also....


BTJ


Re: Any changes in Java and PGSQL 9.4?

From
Bjørn T Johansen
Date:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:25:48 +0100
Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote:

> Bjørn T Johansen wrote on 18.01.2015 20:20:
> > Just noticed that a column field of type bigint containing a null, becomes a 0 when retrieving it from the
resultsetusing JDBC. 
> > If I run the same application against my old 9.3 database, the value retrieved is a null....
> >
> >
>
> You need to show us some code.
>
> getInt() or getLong() can never return null because primitives can't be null in Java.
>
>
>
>
>
>

Yes, you are absolutely correct.. I was fooled by the capital L in getLong but I see that it returns long..
I guess I just hadn't triggered this problem before...


BTJ


Re: Any changes in Java and PGSQL 9.4?

From
Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Bjørn T Johansen wrote on 18.01.2015 20:20:
> Just noticed that a column field of type bigint containing a null, becomes a 0 when retrieving it from the resultset
usingJDBC. 
> If I run the same application against my old 9.3 database, the value retrieved is a null....
>
>

You need to show us some code.

getInt() or getLong() can never return null because primitives can't be null in Java.






--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general