Re: Any changes in Java and PGSQL 9.4? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bjørn T Johansen
Subject Re: Any changes in Java and PGSQL 9.4?
Date
Msg-id 20150118204704.7a100702@pennywise2.havleik.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Any changes in Java and PGSQL 9.4?  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:25:48 +0100
Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote:

> Bjørn T Johansen wrote on 18.01.2015 20:20:
> > Just noticed that a column field of type bigint containing a null, becomes a 0 when retrieving it from the
resultsetusing JDBC. 
> > If I run the same application against my old 9.3 database, the value retrieved is a null....
> >
> >
>
> You need to show us some code.
>
> getInt() or getLong() can never return null because primitives can't be null in Java.
>
>
>
>
>
>

Yes, you are absolutely correct.. I was fooled by the capital L in getLong but I see that it returns long..
I guess I just hadn't triggered this problem before...


BTJ


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bjørn T Johansen
Date:
Subject: Re: Any changes in Java and PGSQL 9.4?
Next
From: James Sewell
Date:
Subject: Partitioning