Thread: Backup WAL Replication Server

Backup WAL Replication Server

From
basti
Date:
Hello,
at the moment we use a Postgres Server as Master and one as Hot-Standby.
The Database is around 50GB and will massive grow next time.

Backup and Restore with pg_dump take several hours, is there a faster
way to do this?

Regards,
Basti


Re: Backup WAL Replication Server

From
Michael Paquier
Date:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:48 PM, basti <mailinglist@unix-solution.de> wrote:
> at the moment we use a Postgres Server as Master and one as Hot-Standby.
> The Database is around 50GB and will massive grow next time.
>
> Backup and Restore with pg_dump take several hours, is there a faster
> way to do this?
Everything is here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/backup.html
Roughly, taking periodic base backups and maintaining WAL archives is
the way to go.
Regards
--
Michael


Re: Backup WAL Replication Server

From
Sergey Konoplev
Date:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:48 AM, basti <mailinglist@unix-solution.de> wrote:
> at the moment we use a Postgres Server as Master and one as Hot-Standby.
> The Database is around 50GB and will massive grow next time.
>
> Backup and Restore with pg_dump take several hours, is there a faster
> way to do this?

Where does pg_backup create an output file? (the same server/file
system, network partition, the same and then scp to another server,
something else)

What is the file system utilization for the partition where you keep
your data with and without pg_backup? (iostat -xk 10)

--
Kind regards,
Sergey Konoplev
PostgreSQL Consultant and DBA

http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
+1 (415) 867-9984, +7 (901) 903-0499, +7 (988) 888-1979
gray.ru@gmail.com