Thread: Indexing strategy

Indexing strategy

From
Phoenix Kiula
Date:
Hi,

Need some help here. I have a large table (200 million rows already).

There are two columns.

ColA
ColB

There is an index on ColA. It's an important column.

ColB is a boolean. Either 1 or 0.

For about 10% of the data, ColB is 1. Otherwise it's default is 0.

Now, my question: for that 10%, is it worth adding a conditional index
on "ColA WHERE ColB = 1"? Will this save time for the queries that are
related to 10% of my data where the ColB is 1? Or will the main
leading index on ColA already speed things up as much as it can?

Thanks for any ideas!

PK

Re: Indexing strategy

From
Andy Colson
Date:
On 04/17/2011 03:52 AM, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Need some help here. I have a large table (200 million rows already).
>
> There are two columns.
>
> ColA
> ColB
>
> There is an index on ColA. It's an important column.
>
> ColB is a boolean. Either 1 or 0.
>
> For about 10% of the data, ColB is 1. Otherwise it's default is 0.
>
> Now, my question: for that 10%, is it worth adding a conditional index
> on "ColA WHERE ColB = 1"? Will this save time for the queries that are
> related to 10% of my data where the ColB is 1? Or will the main
> leading index on ColA already speed things up as much as it can?
>
> Thanks for any ideas!
>
> PK
>
I'll take a wild guess:

it depends on your data:

if colA is highly selectable (ie unique or very nearly so), then it wont help.

if colA is much less unique, and adding colB = 1 will drop the dup's a lot, and you'll always frame query query as
"ColA= ?? and colB = 1", then it'll help. 

said another way, if index on colA gets you very close to what you need, then index on colB wont help.  If index on
colAstill has a lot of similar results, then you gotta ask yourself: will very few have colB = 1?  If yes, then add the
index.

-Andy