Thread: After Trigger

After Trigger

From
Bob Pawley
Date:
I am seeking wording for a procedure that will initiate a trigger only after another trigger has completed its function. In this case I want to drop a table that is created and used by the first trigger.
 
Could someone point me to documentation?
 
Bob Pawley

Re: After Trigger

From
Terry Lee Tucker
Date:
On Thursday 21 September 2006 12:44 pm, Bob Pawley <rjpawley@shaw.ca> thus
communicated:
--> I am seeking wording for a procedure that will initiate a trigger only
 after another trigger has completed its function. In this case I want to
 drop a table that is created and used by the first trigger. -->
--> Could someone point me to documentation?
-->
--> Bob Pawley

According to the 7.4.6 docs:
"If more than one trigger is defined for the same event on the same relation,
the triggers will be fired in alphabetical order by trigger name. In the case
of before triggers, the possibly-modified row returned by each trigger
becomes the input to the next trigger. If any before trigger returns a NULL
pointer, the operation is abandoned and subsequent triggers are not fired. "

So, name the last trigger you want to fire such that it falls aphabetically
behind the rest.
--
Terry Tucker
Turbo's IT Manager
Turbo, division of Ozburn-Hessey Logistics
2251 Jesse Jewell Pkwy NE
Gainesville, GA 30501
Tel: (336) 372-6812  Fax: (336) 372-6812  Cell: (336) 363-4719
terry@esc1.com
www.turbocorp.com

Re: After Trigger

From
Shane Ambler
Date:
On 22/9/2006 2:14, "Bob Pawley" <rjpawley@shaw.ca> wrote:

> I am seeking wording for a procedure that will initiate a trigger only after
> another trigger has completed its function. In this case I want to drop a
> table that is created and used by the first trigger.

Sounds like you should use a temporary table.

CREATE TEMP TABLE mytmptable (......

This table will just disappear shortly after your trigger is finished.

--

Shane Ambler
Postgres@007Marketing.com

Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz



Re: After Trigger

From
Alban Hertroys
Date:
Bob Pawley wrote:
>
> I am seeking wording for a procedure that will initiate a trigger only
> after another trigger has completed its function. In this case I want to
> drop a table that is created and used by the first trigger.

You could just call a function from your trigger, or handle it inside
the trigger.

An alternative approach would be to use a permanent table, fill it
within your transaction and trunk it eventually. To other transactions
there'll never be any data in it, and you lose the overhead of creating
and dropping the table (replacing it by trunking...).

--
Alban Hertroys
alban@magproductions.nl

magproductions b.v.

T: ++31(0)534346874
F: ++31(0)534346876
M:
I: www.magproductions.nl
A: Postbus 416
    7500 AK Enschede

// Integrate Your World //