Thread: Move a table to another schema
I have many tables created in the "public" schema and I would like to migrate these into an "x001" schema. Unfortunately there is no ALTER TABLE construct for this... The following SQL would seem to move the "zxc" table from "public.zxc" to "x001.zxc": UPDATE pg_class SET relnamespace = (SELECT oid FROM pg_namespace WHERE nspname = 'x001') FROM pg_namespace WHERE pg_class.relname = 'zxc' AND pg_namespace.nspname = 'public' AND pg_class.relnamespace = pg_namespace.oid Has anyone else addressed this before? Recommendations? Thanks, L.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 04:05:04PM +0000, Lee Kindness wrote: > I have many tables created in the "public" schema and I would like to > migrate these into an "x001" schema. Unfortunately there is no ALTER > TABLE construct for this... The following SQL would seem to move the > "zxc" table from "public.zxc" to "x001.zxc": You have to move all indexes, constraints, the type, etc too. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>) "There was no reply" (Kernel Traffic)
I would imagine the safest way would be to recreate the table in the new schema and do a INSERT INTO ...SELECT * FROM .... Not elegant, but perfectly safe. You mess with the pg_* catalogs at your own risk. On Nov 17, 2003, at 11:05 AM, Lee Kindness wrote: > I have many tables created in the "public" schema and I would like to > migrate these into an "x001" schema. Unfortunately there is no ALTER > TABLE construct for this... The following SQL would seem to move the > "zxc" table from "public.zxc" to "x001.zxc": > > UPDATE pg_class > SET relnamespace = (SELECT oid FROM pg_namespace WHERE nspname = > 'x001') > FROM pg_namespace > WHERE pg_class.relname = 'zxc' AND > pg_namespace.nspname = 'public' AND > pg_class.relnamespace = pg_namespace.oid > > Has anyone else addressed this before? Recommendations? > > Thanks, L. > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html > -------------------- Andrew Rawnsley President The Ravensfield Digital Resource Group, Ltd. (740) 587-0114 www.ravensfield.com
When I have contemplated doing this, I figured I would just dump the database, then alter the search patch and put in the schema name I wanted instead of public and theoretically the tables and data should be recreated in the new schema. I would create the new schema first. Julie > I have many tables created in the "public" schema and I would like to > migrate these into an "x001" schema. Unfortunately there is no ALTER > TABLE construct for this... The following SQL would seem to move the > "zxc" table from "public.zxc" to "x001.zxc":
Shridhar, Shridhar Daithankar writes: > Lee Kindness wrote: > I have many tables created in the "public" schema and I would like to > migrate these into an "x001" schema. Unfortunately there is no ALTER > TABLE construct for this... The following SQL would seem to move the > "zxc" table from "public.zxc" to "x001.zxc": > > Why not just rename the schema itself? You can recreate a public > schema later..:-) > > Simple, isn't it? (Unless public is a specieal schema) Thanks Shridhar - it's good when someone has a different angle on things! Of course I'm using 7.3, so there is no ALTER SCHEMA - but the catalogue magic required to rename a single schema will be a lot less than renaming 100s of tables, indices and views! L.
Julie May wrote: > When I have contemplated doing this, I figured I would just dump the > database, then alter the search patch and put in the schema name I wanted > instead of public and theoretically the tables and data should be recreated > in the new schema. I would create the new schema first. > > Julie > > >>I have many tables created in the "public" schema and I would like to >>migrate these into an "x001" schema. Unfortunately there is no ALTER >>TABLE construct for this... The following SQL would seem to move the >>"zxc" table from "public.zxc" to "x001.zxc": Why not just rename the schema itself? You can recreate a public schema later..:-) Simple, isn't it? (Unless public is a specieal schema) Shridhar