Thread: Let's see if this helps ... more anti-virus/anti-spam ...

Let's see if this helps ... more anti-virus/anti-spam ...

From
"Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
I've just moved some anti-virus/anti-spam checks a bit closer to the
source, and am now rejecting the following before it even gets to the
anti-virus checking, and/or majordomo:

/^Subject: Thank you!/             REJECT
/^Subject: Re: Thank you!/         REJECT
/^Subject: Re: Wicked screensaver/ REJECT
/^Subject: Wicked screensaver/     REJECT
/^Subject: Re: Re: My details/     REJECT
/^Subject: Re: That movie/         REJECT
/^Subject: That movie/             REJECT
/^Subject: Re: Approved/           REJECT
/^Subject: Approved/               REJECT
/^Subject: Re: Details/            REJECT
/^Subject: Re: Your application/   REJECT
/^Subject: Your application/       REJECT
/^Subject: Re: Your details/       REJECT
/^Subject: Your details/           REJECT
/^Subject: Details/                REJECT

Which seems to be the subject's that are rejected to the whole Sobig virus
... right now, there are ~2000 messages in Majordomo's queue to be
processed, probably about 90% with the above subjects, that is really
really slowing down delivery/processing of *legit* messages to the lists
... hopefully this will keep alot of the garbage out of the queues and get
the lists back on track ...

Just a situation report as to why things are looking soo slow ...

Right now, amavis has processed the following so far today:

neptune# awk '{print $7}' /var/log/amavisd | sort | uniq -c
 305 BAD
 171 BANNED
22554 INFECTED
8854 Passed,

hopefully adding the header_checks into postfix will keep the INFECTED
from growing much more *cross fingers*

Am keeping a close watch on things and will see how it fairs ...

Re: Let's see if this helps ... more anti-virus/anti-spam

From
"Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
'k, I'm using Postfix here ... there are a whack of 'anti-*' checks that I
*can* enable that deal with reverse DNS and a bunch of other things, but I
found when I tried that ages back that there was alot of mail being
rejected from legit sources :(

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Richard Welty wrote:

> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:55:36 -0300 (ADT) "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > I've just moved some anti-virus/anti-spam checks a bit closer to the
> > source, and am now rejecting the following before it even gets to the
> > anti-virus checking, and/or majordomo:
>
> i don't know what MTA you're using, but if it supports syntax checks on the
> HELO/EHLO strings, you might want to look at blocking strings that don't
> include a "." in the middle. the RFCs require this to be either an FQDN or
> a literal IP, and most of the virus stuff is coming from M$ hosts that use
> the BIOS name (not a FQDN) in their HELO strings.
>
> i found i could reject the bulk of the Sobig stuff after receiving a HELO.
>
> richard
> --
> Richard Welty                                         rwelty@averillpark.net
> Averill Park Networking                                         518-573-7592
>     Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
>
>
>

Re: Let's see if this helps ... more anti-virus/anti-spam

From
"Nigel J. Andrews"
Date:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

>
> 'k, I'm using Postfix here ... there are a whack of 'anti-*' checks that I
> *can* enable that deal with reverse DNS and a bunch of other things, but I
> found when I tried that ages back that there was alot of mail being
> rejected from legit sources :(


Hmmm...I don't mail much but that would bounce me out the door I believe. Of
course I could [and probably should] configure things so that the mail hub uses
the right address to get the reverse lookup to succeed but that makes my setup
less logical regarding interface bindings and names.


--
Nigel J. Andrews


>
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Richard Welty wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:55:36 -0300 (ADT) "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I've just moved some anti-virus/anti-spam checks a bit closer to the
> > > source, and am now rejecting the following before it even gets to the
> > > anti-virus checking, and/or majordomo:
> >
> > i don't know what MTA you're using, but if it supports syntax checks on the
> > HELO/EHLO strings, you might want to look at blocking strings that don't
> > include a "." in the middle. the RFCs require this to be either an FQDN or
> > a literal IP, and most of the virus stuff is coming from M$ hosts that use
> > the BIOS name (not a FQDN) in their HELO strings.
> >
> > i found i could reject the bulk of the Sobig stuff after receiving a HELO.