Thread: Posts get losts

Posts get losts

From
Fernando Schapachnik
Date:
Some days ago I sent this to pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org,
but received no reply. Let's see if it's noticed here.

Thanks.

--------
I can't seem to post to the list from my primary address.
At first they showed up after 4-5 days, but now they just
get lost.

My primary address is fernando@mecon.gov.ar

Is there something that can be done?

Thanks!

Fernando Schapachnik

Re: Posts get losts

From
"Daniel R. Anderson"
Date:
Are you using sendmail to send your e-mails from a network other then
mecon.gov.ar?  It's possible your e-mails could be getting refused
because the listserv thinks they're spam.  Then again, anybody want to
help me launder Nigerian drug money? j/k
--
Daniel R. Anderson
Great Lakes Industries, Inc.
80 Pineview Ave.
Buffalo, NY 14218
(716) 691-5900 x218

"Never let your schooling interfere with your education"
    -- Mark Twain


Re: Posts get losts

From
Tom Lane
Date:
"Daniel R. Anderson" <dan@mathjunkies.com> writes:
> Are you using sendmail to send your e-mails from a network other then
> mecon.gov.ar?  It's possible your e-mails could be getting refused
> because the listserv thinks they're spam.

I believe the "From:" header has to match your entry in the subscription
list for the list 'bot to think that it should let your posts through.
Otherwise they get diverted to Marc's moderator queue.

If you're posting from an address other than what you're subscribed
under, fix that.  (If you really want the addresses to be different,
I think you can subscribe your source address but set it to "nomail"
option.  See the help messages available from the majordomo 'bot.)

The TIP attached to this message is curiously relevant:

> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

            regards, tom lane

Re: Posts get losts

From
Fernando Schapachnik
Date:
En un mensaje anterior, Tom Lane escribió:
> "Daniel R. Anderson" <dan@mathjunkies.com> writes:
> > Are you using sendmail to send your e-mails from a network other then
> > mecon.gov.ar?  It's possible your e-mails could be getting refused
> > because the listserv thinks they're spam.
>
> I believe the "From:" header has to match your entry in the subscription
> list for the list 'bot to think that it should let your posts through.
> Otherwise they get diverted to Marc's moderator queue.

My From does match my subscription. From your post:

Received: from relay2.pgsql.com (relay2.pgsql.com [64.49.215.143])
        by relay1.mecon.ar (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2LGVWIf002812
        for <fernando@mecon.gov.ar>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 13:31:32 -0300 (ART)
        (envelope-from pgsql-general-owner+M39528=fernando=mecon.gov.ar@postgresql.org)

So this means my subscribed address is fernando@mecon.gov.ar.

I recall a message from someone else a few weeks ago with kind of the same
problem. He timestamped his email and wondered when would he be receiving
it back?

Regards.

Fernando.

Re: Posts get losts

From
Dennis Gearon
Date:
I would unsubscribe, then resubscribe.

Fernando Schapachnik wrote:
> En un mensaje anterior, Tom Lane escribió:
>
>>"Daniel R. Anderson" <dan@mathjunkies.com> writes:
>>
>>>Are you using sendmail to send your e-mails from a network other then
>>>mecon.gov.ar?  It's possible your e-mails could be getting refused
>>>because the listserv thinks they're spam.
>>
>>I believe the "From:" header has to match your entry in the subscription
>>list for the list 'bot to think that it should let your posts through.
>>Otherwise they get diverted to Marc's moderator queue.
>
>
> My From does match my subscription. From your post:
>
> Received: from relay2.pgsql.com (relay2.pgsql.com [64.49.215.143])
>         by relay1.mecon.ar (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2LGVWIf002812
>         for <fernando@mecon.gov.ar>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 13:31:32 -0300 (ART)
>         (envelope-from pgsql-general-owner+M39528=fernando=mecon.gov.ar@postgresql.org)
>
> So this means my subscribed address is fernando@mecon.gov.ar.
>
> I recall a message from someone else a few weeks ago with kind of the same
> problem. He timestamped his email and wondered when would he be receiving
> it back?
>
> Regards.
>
> Fernando.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>


Re: Posts get losts

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Fernando Schapachnik <fpscha@cvi.com.ar> writes:
> En un mensaje anterior, Tom Lane escribi�:
>> I believe the "From:" header has to match your entry in the subscription
>> list for the list 'bot to think that it should let your posts through.

> [snip]

> So this means my subscribed address is fernando@mecon.gov.ar.

Indeed.  And your From: line says

From: Fernando Schapachnik <fpscha@cvi.com.ar>

which doesn't look like the same address to me, and certainly won't be
considered the same by majordomo ...

            regards, tom lane

Re: Posts get losts

From
Fernando Schapachnik
Date:
En un mensaje anterior, Tom Lane escribió:
> Fernando Schapachnik <fpscha@cvi.com.ar> writes:
> > En un mensaje anterior, Tom Lane escribió:
> >> I believe the "From:" header has to match your entry in the subscription
> >> list for the list 'bot to think that it should let your posts through.
>
> > [snip]
>
> > So this means my subscribed address is fernando@mecon.gov.ar.
>
> Indeed.  And your From: line says
>
> From: Fernando Schapachnik <fpscha@cvi.com.ar>

This is an alternative address (from somewhere else) I'm using to
bring this issue up. The problem is with my work address.

(Yes, I could keep using this, but appart from the annoyance it
doesn't help to fix the underlying problem or undocumented
condition that might be affecting others or be a random problem.)

Regards.

Fernando.

Re: Posts get losts

From
Fernando Schapachnik
Date:
Did that. Testing now...

En un mensaje anterior, Dennis Gearon escribió:
> I would unsubscribe, then resubscribe.