Thread: Comparision of DBs (new to list)
Hi - I'm new to the list - G'Day to everyone! Q: Is there a product comparison matrix (either static or like crash-me at MySQL)? http://www.mysql.com/information/crash-me.php I would like to compare: PostgreSQL 7.1, M$ SQL Server 7+ and Oracle 9i. I could not find anything searching the archives. Thanks in advance, Kym Farnik (mailto:kym@recalldesign.com) -- Recall Design http://www.recalldesign.com
Attachment
> Q: Is there a product comparison matrix (either static or > like crash-me at MySQL)? > http://www.mysql.com/information/crash-me.php > > I would like to compare: > PostgreSQL 7.1, M$ SQL Server 7+ and Oracle 9i. I haven't found exact comparisons either. They are good to get a general idea about the capabilites if you would just like a starting place, however I would not use solely such a comparison for an important decision. One problem I found with mysql's crashme is that it was somewhat misleading. By that I don't mean to say that the mysql team has intentionally distorted anything. What I mean is that it is quite hard to measure exact feature translations from different databases. For example, mysql (an I believe mssql) uses "auto_increment" to assign a number to a record automatically. PostgreSQL uses sequences, which are a different approach that can accomplish the same goal. I don't think that the mysql crashme recognizes that postgres can accomplish this task, since it can't be accomplished in the same exact way. So, for a real comparison, read some documentation about each database, and determine how/if you could implement your required features in each. After that, of course, you can see if a database seems to be more stable or faster or easier to work with than another that met your requirements. You can also always ask a mailing list how you accomplish a given task in their respective database, and see if you like it more/less than another database. Of course, all this testing & experimentation is much cheaper with a free database like postgres. Regards, Jeff
Hi - Thanks - thats why I asked, the crashme tests take an MySQL perspective whereas I would like a PGsql perspective. BTW: Oracle product comparisons do an Oracle perspective, M$ do a M$ perspective, FredBlogSQL does a FredBlogSQL perspective etc. IT Marketing - don't you love it! :-) Kym > Kym Wrote: > Q: Is there a product comparison matrix (either static or > > like crash-me at MySQL)? > > http://www.mysql.com/information/crash-me.php > > > > I would like to compare: > > PostgreSQL 7.1, M$ SQL Server 7+ and Oracle 9i. Jeff wrote: > > I haven't found exact comparisons either. They are good to get a > general idea > about the capabilites if you would just like a starting place, however I > would not use solely such a comparison for an important decision. > One problem > I found with mysql's crashme is that it was somewhat misleading. > By that I > don't mean to say that the mysql team has intentionally distorted > anything. > What I mean is that it is quite hard to measure exact feature > translations > from different databases. > > For example, mysql (an I believe mssql) uses "auto_increment" to assign a > number to a record automatically. PostgreSQL uses sequences, which are a > different approach that can accomplish the same goal. I don't > think that the > mysql crashme recognizes that postgres can accomplish this task, since it > can't be accomplished in the same exact way. > > So, for a real comparison, read some documentation about each > database, and > determine how/if you could implement your required features in > each. After > that, of course, you can see if a database seems to be more > stable or faster > or easier to work with than another that met your requirements. > > You can also always ask a mailing list how you accomplish a given task in > their respective database, and see if you like it more/less than another > database. > > Of course, all this testing & experimentation is much cheaper with a free > database like postgres. > > Regards, > Jeff >
Attachment
Hi - Thanks - thats why I asked, the crashme tests take an MySQL perspective whereas I would like a PGsql perspective. BTW: Oracle product comparisons do an Oracle perspective, M$ do a M$ perspective, FredBlogSQL does a FredBlogSQL perspective etc. IT Marketing - don't you love it! :-) Kym > Kym Wrote: > Q: Is there a product comparison matrix (either static or > > like crash-me at MySQL)? > > http://www.mysql.com/information/crash-me.php > > > > I would like to compare: > > PostgreSQL 7.1, M$ SQL Server 7+ and Oracle 9i. Jeff wrote: > > I haven't found exact comparisons either. They are good to get a > general idea > about the capabilites if you would just like a starting place, however I > would not use solely such a comparison for an important decision. > One problem > I found with mysql's crashme is that it was somewhat misleading. > By that I > don't mean to say that the mysql team has intentionally distorted > anything. > What I mean is that it is quite hard to measure exact feature > translations > from different databases. > > For example, mysql (an I believe mssql) uses "auto_increment" to assign a > number to a record automatically. PostgreSQL uses sequences, which are a > different approach that can accomplish the same goal. I don't > think that the > mysql crashme recognizes that postgres can accomplish this task, since it > can't be accomplished in the same exact way. > > So, for a real comparison, read some documentation about each > database, and > determine how/if you could implement your required features in > each. After > that, of course, you can see if a database seems to be more > stable or faster > or easier to work with than another that met your requirements. > > You can also always ask a mailing list how you accomplish a given task in > their respective database, and see if you like it more/less than another > database. > > Of course, all this testing & experimentation is much cheaper with a free > database like postgres. > > Regards, > Jeff >