Thread: JDBC
Scuse me
I am interesting in a COMPILED debugged version of JDBC driver for 7.02 (driver for J 1.2,1.2 and1.3).
Thanks,
Enrico
Due to me moving home and my day job taking precedence, I've not had chance to do anything since 7.0, so there is no difference between 7.0, and 7.0.2.
I'm working though the backlog of patches & bug fixes at the moment. I had hoped to have something online last night, but I'm still having problems with my internet connection at home (I'm currently replying via the works connection), so it's been held back.
As soon as I have something useful (unless a disaster occurs it should be this week), I'll be posting an announcement on the lists.
Peter
--
Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk, me@petermount.com
Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk Contact details: http://petermount.com
PostgreSQL JDBC: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk, me@petermount.com
Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk Contact details: http://petermount.com
PostgreSQL JDBC: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
----- Original Message -----From: Enrico CominiSent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 10:05 AMSubject: [GENERAL] JDBCScuse meI am interesting in a COMPILED debugged version of JDBC driver for 7.02 (driver for J 1.2,1.2 and1.3).Thanks,Enrico
Maybe we should put up a copy of the JDBC driver that's in the CVS. absolute, relative, and first are broken in the released versions of the driver. I had some patches applied that fixed these and this version in the CVS. I think some other changes have been made as well. Should it be made available, at least in compiled form?
Travis
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@hub.org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@hub.org]On Behalf Of Enrico Comini
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 4:05 AM
To: ML-Postrges-general
Subject: [GENERAL] JDBCScuse meI am interesting in a COMPILED debugged version of JDBC driver for 7.02 (driver for J 1.2,1.2 and1.3).Thanks,Enrico
Nothing has changed since 7.0 was released, so the binaries on www.retep.org.uk/postgres are the current version.
The compiled form has been available online for at least 3 years now.
Peter
--
Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk, me@petermount.com
Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk Contact details: http://petermount.com
PostgreSQL JDBC: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk, me@petermount.com
Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk Contact details: http://petermount.com
PostgreSQL JDBC: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
----- Original Message -----From: Travis BauerSent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 12:14 PMSubject: RE: [GENERAL] JDBCMaybe we should put up a copy of the JDBC driver that's in the CVS. absolute, relative, and first are broken in the released versions of the driver. I had some patches applied that fixed these and this version in the CVS. I think some other changes have been made as well. Should it be made available, at least in compiled form?Travis-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@hub.org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@hub.org]On Behalf Of Enrico Comini
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 4:05 AM
To: ML-Postrges-general
Subject: [GENERAL] JDBCScuse meI am interesting in a COMPILED debugged version of JDBC driver for 7.02 (driver for J 1.2,1.2 and1.3).Thanks,Enrico
That's not true. Look at the cvs log for src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/ResultSet.java There are entries for June 7 and June 9. These are changes I made to ResultSet.java to make it more JDBC2 compliant. These changes are not in the 7.0.2 release, and the functions I mentioned in the previous posting do not work properly in the current release. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Travis Bauer | CS Grad Student | IU |www.cs.indiana.edu/~trbauer ---------------------------------------------------------------- On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Peter Mount wrote: > Nothing has changed since 7.0 was released, so the binaries on www.retep.org.uk/postgres are the current> The compiledform has been available online for at least 3 years now. > > Peter
Ah, just checked. Bruce applied those changes. I'm thinking we may have the same problem I had with 6.5.3, the changes were in cvs, but didn't get out to the release. Marc, any ideas? Peter -- Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk, me@petermount.com Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk Contact details: http://petermount.com PostgreSQL JDBC: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/ Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Travis Bauer" <trbauer@cs.indiana.edu> To: "Peter Mount" <peter@retep.org.uk> Cc: <algobit@algobit.com>; "ML-Postrges-general" <Pgsql-General@postgresql.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 3:22 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] JDBC > > That's not true. Look at the cvs log for > src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/ResultSet.java > > There are entries for June 7 and June 9. These are changes I made to > ResultSet.java to make it more JDBC2 compliant. These changes are not > in the 7.0.2 release, and the functions I mentioned in the > previous posting do not work properly in the current release. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Travis Bauer | CS Grad Student | IU |www.cs.indiana.edu/~trbauer > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Peter Mount wrote: > > > Nothing has changed since 7.0 was released, so the binaries on www.retep.org.uk/postgres are the current> The compiled form has been available online for at least 3 years now. > > > > Peter >