Re: JDBC - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Mount
Subject Re: JDBC
Date
Msg-id 010c01c01746$660dbda0$6f0010ac@heather
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JDBC  (Travis Bauer <trbauer@cs.indiana.edu>)
List pgsql-general
Ah, just checked. Bruce applied those changes.

I'm thinking we may have the same problem I had with 6.5.3, the changes were
in cvs, but didn't get out to the release. Marc, any ideas?

Peter

--
Peter T Mount  peter@retep.org.uk, me@petermount.com
Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk Contact details: http://petermount.com
PostgreSQL JDBC: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Travis Bauer" <trbauer@cs.indiana.edu>
To: "Peter Mount" <peter@retep.org.uk>
Cc: <algobit@algobit.com>; "ML-Postrges-general"
<Pgsql-General@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] JDBC


>
> That's not true.  Look at the cvs log for
> src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/ResultSet.java
>
> There are entries for June 7 and June 9.  These are changes I made to
> ResultSet.java to make it more JDBC2 compliant.  These changes are not
> in the 7.0.2 release, and the functions I mentioned in the
> previous posting do not work properly in the current release.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Travis Bauer | CS Grad Student | IU |www.cs.indiana.edu/~trbauer
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Peter Mount wrote:
>
> > Nothing has changed since 7.0 was released, so the binaries on
www.retep.org.uk/postgres are the current> The compiled form has been
available online for at least 3 years now.
> >
> > Peter
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Travis Bauer
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC
Next
From: Marcin Mazurek
Date:
Subject: plpgsql function