Thread: Migration page is out of date
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/migration.html This page: a) has insufficient coverage of pg_upgrade b) ignores parallel pg_restore c) piping pg_dump is by no means always the fastest method I'll write up a new version later, just wanted to put this note on the ML so that somebody would bug me before the end of 9.1 beta. -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com
Hello Josh, On 22.03.2011 17:56, Josh Berkus wrote: > I'll write up a new version later, just wanted to put this note on the > ML so that somebody would bug me before the end of 9.1 beta. I really could hug you for this warning. I am translating backup.sgml at the moment. Means, I will stop after PITR and will wait before I will translate the rest of the file. Wait means - I will start to translate another topic first. Susanne -- Susanne Ebrecht - 2ndQuadrant PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services www.2ndQuadrant.com
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/migration.html > > This page: > > a) has insufficient coverage of pg_upgrade > b) ignores parallel pg_restore > c) piping pg_dump is by no means always the fastest method > > I'll write up a new version later, just wanted to put this note on the > ML so that somebody would bug me before the end of 9.1 beta. Hey, you! -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/migration.html > > > > This page: > > > > a) has insufficient coverage of pg_upgrade > > b) ignores parallel pg_restore > > c) piping pg_dump is by no means always the fastest method > > > > I'll write up a new version later, just wanted to put this note on the > > ML so that somebody would bug me before the end of 9.1 beta. > > Hey, you! I am not sure if you were aware that I re-did the upgrade section of the docs to clearly mention pg_upgrade and other issues: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/upgrading.html I am not sure how to mention parallel pg_restore when pg_dumpall can't be used in parallel restore mode. Any suggested changes? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
>>> I'll write up a new version later, just wanted to put this note on the >>> ML so that somebody would bug me before the end of 9.1 beta. >> >> Hey, you! Well, a bit late now. Clearly posting stuff to the -docs list is not a good way for me to remember it. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com