Re: Migration page is out of date - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Migration page is out of date
Date
Msg-id 201109061640.p86Ges103842@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Migration page is out of date  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Migration page is out of date
List pgsql-docs
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/migration.html
> >
> > This page:
> >
> > a) has insufficient coverage of pg_upgrade
> > b) ignores parallel pg_restore
> > c) piping pg_dump is by no means always the fastest method
> >
> > I'll write up a new version later, just wanted to put this note on the
> > ML so that somebody would bug me before the end of 9.1 beta.
>
> Hey, you!

I am not sure if you were aware that I re-did the upgrade section of the
docs to clearly mention pg_upgrade and other issues:

    http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/upgrading.html

I am not sure how to mention parallel pg_restore when pg_dumpall can't
be used in parallel restore mode.

Any suggested changes?

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: about value storage
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] documentation bug - behave of NEW a OLD in plpgsql's triggers