Thread: pgsql: Prevent certain symbols that are used for both typedefs and

pgsql: Prevent certain symbols that are used for both typedefs and

From
momjian@svr1.postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian)
Date:
Log Message:
-----------
Prevent certain symbols that are used for both typedefs and variable
names from being added to pgindent's typedef list.  The existance of
them caused weird formatting in the date/type files, and in keywords.c.

Backpatch to 8.1.X.

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgsql/src/tools:
        find_typedef (r1.4 -> r1.5)
        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/tools/find_typedef.diff?r1=1.4&r2=1.5)
    pgsql/src/tools/pgindent:
        pgindent (r1.84 -> r1.85)
        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/tools/pgindent/pgindent.diff?r1=1.84&r2=1.85)

Re: pgsql: Prevent certain symbols that are used for both typedefs and

From
Tom Lane
Date:
momjian@svr1.postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> Prevent certain symbols that are used for both typedefs and variable
> names from being added to pgindent's typedef list.  The existance of
> them caused weird formatting in the date/type files, and in keywords.c.

Maybe it would be better to do some judicious renaming in the sources
to avoid the conflicts?  ISTM that failing to mark a typedef as such
will inevitably result in bad formatting of code that uses the name
as a typedef.

            regards, tom lane

Re: pgsql: Prevent certain symbols that are used for both

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
Tom Lane wrote:
> momjian@svr1.postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> > Prevent certain symbols that are used for both typedefs and variable
> > names from being added to pgindent's typedef list.  The existance of
> > them caused weird formatting in the date/type files, and in keywords.c.
>
> Maybe it would be better to do some judicious renaming in the sources
> to avoid the conflicts?  ISTM that failing to mark a typedef as such
> will inevitably result in bad formatting of code that uses the name
> as a typedef.

Yea, but I don't want to do anything like that now, especially since
most of the date/time typedefs are used by ecpg and I am unsure what
affect changing those might have.

My logic was that is was better to have ecpg unclearly typedef'ed in a
few places than to have an adt/ file show "interval    ->days".  "ANY"
is coming from plperl but I can't see from where.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073