Thread: pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt like.c like_match.c
CVSROOT: /cvsroot Module name: pgsql Changes by: ishii@postgresql.org 01/10/03 22:15:47 Modified files: src/backend/utils/adt: like.c Added files: src/backend/utils/adt: like_match.c Log message: Optimization for single byte encodings.
ishii@postgresql.org writes: > Modified files: > src/backend/utils/adt: like.c > Added files: > src/backend/utils/adt: like_match.c > Log message: > Optimization for single byte encodings. Hrrm ... I'd sort of expect to see a Makefile update in there ... regards, tom lane
> ishii@postgresql.org writes: > > Modified files: > > src/backend/utils/adt: like.c > > Added files: > > src/backend/utils/adt: like_match.c > > > Log message: > > Optimization for single byte encodings. > > Hrrm ... I'd sort of expect to see a Makefile update in there ... Do you want this kind of depedency in Makefie? like.c: like_match.c -- Tatsuo Ishii
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes: > Do you want this kind of depedency in Makefie? > like.c: like_match.c Shouldn't it be like.o to like_match.c? Actually you probably need like.o: like.c like_match.c to keep gmake from deriving the wrong default make rule ... regards, tom lane
> Shouldn't it be like.o to like_match.c? Actually you probably need > > like.o: like.c like_match.c > > to keep gmake from deriving the wrong default make rule ... Done. Also I modified regex/Makefile to add the dependency for regexec.c. -- Tatsuo Ishii
Tom Lane writes: > Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes: > > Do you want this kind of depedency in Makefie? > > > like.c: like_match.c > > Shouldn't it be like.o to like_match.c? Technically yes, but since it's an #included file you don't need it at all if all you want is to get it to compile. For complete dependencies it's --enable-depend and this one will be included automatically. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> Shouldn't it be like.o to like_match.c? > Technically yes, but since it's an #included file you don't need it at all > if all you want is to get it to compile. For complete dependencies it's > --enable-depend and this one will be included automatically. Sure, but there are a few dependencies that seem important enough to hard-wire into the Makefiles, so that they'll be honored even if you don't do --enable-depend. backend/parser has some, for example. This one seemed to me to be of that ilk. I expect to have to be careful if I hack .h files without having enabled dependencies ... but one normally doesn't need to think about that for .c files. regards, tom lane