Thread: Configure error on Openssl with Beta5
Hi, I have been unable to get the configure script to work with the v8 beta 5 distribution when the --with-openssl option is used. I am using Whitebox Linux and have tried reinstalling/removing all the openssl packages and also installing openssl from source with no luck. I am able to get the configure script to work and build without the openssl option. I am also able to build v7.4.6 fine with openssl. Thanks, Aaron Clauson
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 12:56:51AM -0000, Aaron Clauson wrote: > I have been unable to get the configure script to work with the v8 beta 5 > distribution when the --with-openssl option is used. What's the exact configure command you're using and what error do you get? What does the end of config.log say? -- Michael Fuhr http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Aaron Clauson wrote:
> I have been unable to get the configure script to work with the v8 beta 5
> distribution when the --with-openssl option is used.
>
> I am using Whitebox Linux and have tried reinstalling/removing all the
> openssl packages and also installing openssl from source with no luck.
ln -s /usr/kerberos/include/* /usr/include/
will solve your problem, I think. I do the the same in every fresh RHEL
(AFAIR WBEL is identical to RHEL) installations.
Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBstVstl86P3SPfQ4RAs/wAJ9c2Bd5cKSghHBZFcwajkRh6c8OzACgyLtf
NUFKV9pXOz2FnF9lUyYUJGo=
=uEWG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Aaron Clauson wrote:
> Yes that fixed it. I don't know why? I was hunting around for anything to do
> with ssl not with kerberos...
>
> I could run the 7.4.6 configure without needing the symbolic link but perhaps
> this is an issue restricted to RedHat and Whitebox.
That's true. AFAIK RHEL has a missing symlink, which is a known issue...
Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBstp4tl86P3SPfQ4RAo25AJ0Ry53IX2kIPcSmBMvWYx9iH6riHwCgusUP
GgoB2D1rc0siOQjmryyMHg8=
=6udm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org> writes:
> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Aaron Clauson wrote:
>> I have been unable to get the configure script to work with the v8 beta 5
>> distribution when the --with-openssl option is used.
> ln -s /usr/kerberos/include/* /usr/include/
?? I've not had to do that on any Red Hat machine I've used ...
regards, tom lane
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ln -s /usr/kerberos/include/* /usr/include/
>
> ?? I've not had to do that on any Red Hat machine I've used ...
Have you tried on RHEL ES 3.0, at least?
This problem was what I have experienced during RPM builds, months ago,
and I remember to have talked this issue on lists...
Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBs2LPtl86P3SPfQ4RAnuQAKCUibpplCCnWCtnFdKze1JnUpSN5wCg1toE
iFFlvCQn8Qx5WwnT9vJTy2I=
=m3ND
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org> writes:
> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ?? I've not had to do that on any Red Hat machine I've used ...
> Have you tried on RHEL ES 3.0, at least?
I've never installed 3.0 locally, but I have built --with-openssl
on RHL 8.0 and Fedora Core 3, which bracket RHEL-3, and not noticed
any need to mess with kerberos includes in order to build PG.
(On my current Fedora installation I don't seem to have
/usr/kerberos/include at all.)
I notice that the Red Hat RPMs do some include-path hacking when
%kerberos is enabled, but nothing for SSL ...
regards, tom lane
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Have you tried on RHEL ES 3.0, at least?
>
> I've never installed 3.0 locally, but I have built --with-openssl
> on RHL 8.0 and Fedora Core 3, which bracket RHEL-3, and not noticed
> any need to mess with kerberos includes in order to build PG.
> (On my current Fedora installation I don't seem to have
> /usr/kerberos/include at all.)
>
> I notice that the Red Hat RPMs do some include-path hacking when
> %kerberos is enabled, but nothing for SSL ...
The problem is... linking /usr/kerberos/include/* to /usr/include solves
ssl build problem :) To say he truth, I didn't search the code for it:
but googled a bit and found the "solution".
Anyway, this seems to be a RHEL-specific problem; not related to
PostgreSQL; since other versions (RH X and FC X) does not have this
problem.
Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBs2igtl86P3SPfQ4RAjm/AKDYqeAcoUbJYu48OyPXjv7m4qbhjgCg32IN
RvrTjntjGqVR7EQfG/RYLz4=
=sWbw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi, Yes that fixed it. I don't know why? I was hunting around for anything to do with ssl not with kerberos... I could run the 7.4.6 configure without needing the symbolic link but perhaps this is an issue restricted to RedHat and Whitebox. Thanks a lot, Aaron ----- Original Message ----- From: "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim@gunduz.org> To: "Aaron Clauson" <aaronc@blueface.ie> Cc: <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 9:31 AM Subject: Re: [BUGS] Configure error on Openssl with Beta5 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hi, > > On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Aaron Clauson wrote: > >> I have been unable to get the configure script to work with the v8 beta 5 >> distribution when the --with-openssl option is used. >> >> I am using Whitebox Linux and have tried reinstalling/removing all the >> openssl packages and also installing openssl from source with no luck. > > ln -s /usr/kerberos/include/* /usr/include/ > > will solve your problem, I think. I do the the same in every fresh RHEL > (AFAIR WBEL is identical to RHEL) installations. > > Regards, > - -- > Devrim GUNDUZ devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr > http://www.tdmsoft.com > http://www.gunduz.org > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFBstVstl86P3SPfQ4RAs/wAJ9c2Bd5cKSghHBZFcwajkRh6c8OzACgyLtf > NUFKV9pXOz2FnF9lUyYUJGo= > =uEWG > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >