Re: Configure error on Openssl with Beta5 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Configure error on Openssl with Beta5
Date
Msg-id 18069.1102275938@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Configure error on Openssl with Beta5  (Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Responses Re: Configure error on Openssl with Beta5  (Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org>)
List pgsql-bugs
Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org> writes:
> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ??  I've not had to do that on any Red Hat machine I've used ...

> Have you tried on RHEL ES 3.0, at least?

I've never installed 3.0 locally, but I have built --with-openssl
on RHL 8.0 and Fedora Core 3, which bracket RHEL-3, and not noticed
any need to mess with kerberos includes in order to build PG.
(On my current Fedora installation I don't seem to have
/usr/kerberos/include at all.)

I notice that the Red Hat RPMs do some include-path hacking when
%kerberos is enabled, but nothing for SSL ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Devrim GUNDUZ
Date:
Subject: Re: Configure error on Openssl with Beta5
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: serial drop error