Thread: german speed benchmarks
Google Alert for: *mysql* *MySQL* wins database speed contest <http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2006/08/mysql_wins_data.html> InfoWorld - San Francisco,CA,USA The results are in, and *MySQL* came out on top. *...* From the announcement: "The DVD shop created by *MySQL* is the hands-down winner of the performance crown. *...* -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.6/428 - Release Date: 8/25/2006
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 16:09 -0700, mdean wrote: > Google Alert for: *mysql* *MySQL* wins database speed contest > <http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2006/08/mysql_wins_data.html> Yes, this has been discussed before: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2006-06/msg00052.php -Neil
mdean wrote: > Google Alert for: *mysql* *MySQL* wins database speed contest > <http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2006/08/mysql_wins_data.html> > > InfoWorld - San Francisco,CA,USA > The results are in, and *MySQL* came out on top. *...* From the > announcement: "The DVD shop created by *MySQL* is the hands-down winner > of the performance crown. *...* I downloaded the source for this test, but they do not include the data they used, only the schema etc... Joshua D. Drake > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Also sprach mdean (mdean@xn1.com) > Google Alert for: *mysql* *MySQL* wins database speed contest > <http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2006/08/mysql_wins_data.html> > InfoWorld - San Francisco,CA,USA > The results are in, and *MySQL* came out on top. *...* From the > announcement: "The DVD shop created by *MySQL* is the hands-down winner > of the performance crown. *...* There was at least one PG-Team lead by Alvar Freude, I guess he can give more details. However, that article gives no background about the contest and the benchmark and how the results cam off, so it's more or less useless. I didn't buy the c't issue where the final results where posted, unfortunately I can't find them online. -- PGP FPR: CF74 D5F2 4871 3E5C FFFE 0130 11F4 C41E B3FB AE33 -- http://www.net-tex.de http://www.cryptomancer.de
Attachment
> I didn't buy the c't issue where the final results where posted, > unfortunately I can't find them online. The article is here: http://www.mysql.de/ct-dbcontest (see also current discussion on pgsql-general and previous discussion on pgsql-advocacy) Bye, Chris. -- Chris Mair http://www.1006.org