Thread: CVS server ?

CVS server ?

From
John Bercik
Date:
Is the server down?  

[root@sandman root]# cvs -z3 -d
:pserver:anonymous@cvs.pgadmin.org:/disk1/cvsroot co pgadmin3
Unknown host cvs.pgadmin.org.




-- 
Best regards,

John Bercik                E-Mail: bercikj@musc.edu    
Systems Programmer            Office: 843/792-1715
Medical University of South Carolina    Fax: 843/792-0816
Room 826F Clinical Science Building
76 Jonathan Lucas Street
Charleston, SC, USA  29425



Re: CVS server ?

From
"Dave Page"
Date:
DNS problem - should be OK now.

Regards, Dave.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Bercik [mailto:bercikj@musc.edu]
> Sent: 03 July 2003 12:23
> To: pgadmin support
> Subject: [pgadmin-support] CVS server ?
>
>
> Is the server down?
>
> [root@sandman root]# cvs -z3 -d
> :pserver:anonymous@cvs.pgadmin.org:/disk1/cvsroot co pgadmin3
> Unknown host cvs.pgadmin.org.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> John Bercik                E-Mail: bercikj@musc.edu
> Systems Programmer            Office: 843/792-1715
> Medical University of South Carolina    Fax: 843/792-0816
> Room 826F Clinical Science Building
> 76 Jonathan Lucas Street
> Charleston, SC, USA  29425
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>


Re: CVS server ?

From
"Mark Perez"
Date:
Hello,

I am having a problem when I import and export a table from Access 97 after
making a change in pgadmin.  There are many tables in my database that i
utilize and I need the interface with Access 97.

Is there a reason that Access 97 does not recognize the database "after"
changes have been made in pgadmin, ie, add a column, field, etc.?

If anyone has this answer, or knows someone who does, please let me know.

Best regards,

Mark A. Perez
IT Specialist
Woods Hole Group
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "John Bercik" <bercikj@musc.edu>; "pgadmin support"
<pgadmin-support@postgresql.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] CVS server ?


DNS problem - should be OK now.

Regards, Dave.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Bercik [mailto:bercikj@musc.edu]
> Sent: 03 July 2003 12:23
> To: pgadmin support
> Subject: [pgadmin-support] CVS server ?
>
>
> Is the server down?
>
> [root@sandman root]# cvs -z3 -d
> :pserver:anonymous@cvs.pgadmin.org:/disk1/cvsroot co pgadmin3
> Unknown host cvs.pgadmin.org.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> John Bercik E-Mail: bercikj@musc.edu
> Systems Programmer Office: 843/792-1715
> Medical University of South Carolina Fax: 843/792-0816
> Room 826F Clinical Science Building
> 76 Jonathan Lucas Street
> Charleston, SC, USA  29425
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
              http://archives.postgresql.org




Windows 2000 Server and PostgreSQL

From
"Mark Perez"
Date:
Hello,

I have a very large cutomized program that utilizes PostgreSQL for my Access
97 databases.  My network inferstructure consists of Red Hat, Novell and
Microsoft.  I want to convert my data into Microsoft Server in order to have
a VPD directly for those who work out of the organization.  At this time, I
cannot do this because of security issues with Novell.  I would like to keep
Novell as a file server, but would like to expand my Microsoft Network and
make it the Primary Domain for VPN.

I want to minimize my network to Microsoft Server 2000/2003, but
unfortunately I was aware that PostreSQL is not compatible with Microsoft
Server.

Is there an update or anyway I can do this without changing my entire
database?

Please help?

Mark A. Perez
IT Specialist
Woods Hole Group




Re: CVS server ?

From
"Dave Page"
Date:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Perez [mailto:mperez@whgrp.com]
> Sent: 03 July 2003 20:26
> To: Dave Page; John Bercik; pgadmin support
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] CVS server ?
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am having a problem when I import and export a table from
> Access 97 after making a change in pgadmin.  There are many
> tables in my database that i utilize and I need the interface
> with Access 97.
>
> Is there a reason that Access 97 does not recognize the
> database "after" changes have been made in pgadmin, ie, add a
> column, field, etc.?
>
> If anyone has this answer, or knows someone who does, please
> let me know.

This is a little off topic for this list (pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org is a
better place for Access help), but iirc, Access only examines the table
structure when you initially link it - from that point on it's assumes
to stay the same. Therefore after you change a table you must relink it.

Regards, Dave.


Re: Windows 2000 Server and PostgreSQL

From
Andreas Pflug
Date:
Mark Perez wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I have a very large cutomized program that utilizes PostgreSQL for my Access
>97 databases.  My network inferstructure consists of Red Hat, Novell and
>Microsoft.  I want to convert my data into Microsoft Server in order to have
>a VPD directly for those who work out of the organization.
>
Well it's kind of weird porting the other way round...
Actually, most people will want to port from MSSQL to PostgreSQL to get 
rid of licenses fees.
What do you mean with VPD? Is it a typo, and you mean VPN? There's no 
reason why you shouldn't run PostgreSQL over VPN (IPSEC, PPTP or any 
other). Communication is a standard TCP/IP connection, port is 
configurable if neccesary (in case you like port 1433 better :-)

>  At this time, I
>cannot do this because of security issues with Novell.  I would like to keep
>Novell as a file server, but would like to expand my Microsoft Network and
>make it the Primary Domain for VPN.
>
>I want to minimize my network to Microsoft Server 2000/2003, but
>unfortunately I was aware that PostreSQL is not compatible with Microsoft
>Server.
>
Well, actually MSSQL isn't as compatible to ANSI as every database 
should be :-) PostgreSQL is supposed to be the most ANSI compliant 
database system on this planet, and it's very flexible in addition. So 
it can mimic a lot of stuff that other databases do, and makes it easier 
to port from xyzDBMS to PostgreSQL. But there are also many features in 
pgsql you won't find in MSSQL.

Anyhow, this mailing list is totally wrong for you, pgadmin is the 
maintenance tool for pgsql. But You probably won't find much experience 
in pgsql mailing lists for porting from pgsql to other systems...

Regards,
Andreas