Thread: FTP directories

FTP directories

From
Jean-Michel POURE
Date:
Dear all,

The ftp directory on Snake has "beta" and "release" directories. Is it still
worth publishing the "beta" directory? It could confuse users who may
consider "beta" as a more recent work than "release".

I would be in favor of removing the "beta" directory to keep it simple. The
other solution would be to rename "beta" 0.9.2 and "release" 1.0.0.

Cheers, Jean-Michel


Re: FTP directories

From
"Dave Page"
Date:
Agreed (to removing them). I also intend to clear down all the snapshot
directories.

Regards,Dave.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:jm@poure.com]
> Sent: 26 September 2003 14:44
> To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] FTP directories
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> The ftp directory on Snake has "beta" and "release"
> directories. Is it still
> worth publishing the "beta" directory? It could confuse users who may
> consider "beta" as a more recent work than "release".
>
> I would be in favor of removing the "beta" directory to keep
> it simple. The
> other solution would be to rename "beta" 0.9.2 and "release" 1.0.0.
>
> Cheers, Jean-Michel
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
> majordomo@postgresql.org
>

Re: FTP directories

From
Andreas Pflug
Date:
Dave Page wrote:

>Agreed (to removing them). I also intend to clear down all the snapshot
>directories.
>
>
Ok, burn the contents, but not the dirs. We need them for upcoming patches.

Regards.
Andreas




Re: FTP directories

From
"Dave Page"
Date:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de]
> Sent: 26 September 2003 16:37
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: jm@poure.com; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] FTP directories
>
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> >Agreed (to removing them). I also intend to clear down all
> the snapshot
> >directories.
> >
> >
> Ok, burn the contents, but not the dirs.

That cleared quite a few Gb - I hadn't realised we'd used so much.

> We need them for upcoming patches.

Snapshots off the main branch you mean, or are you intending to make
snapshots from the patches branch? That could get messy...

Regards, Dave.

Re: FTP directories

From
Andreas Pflug
Date:
Dave Page wrote:

>
>
>Snapshots off the main branch you mean, or are you intending to make
>snapshots from the patches branch? That could get messy...
>
Main branch should be enough.

Regards,
Andreas



Re: FTP directories

From
Raphaël Enrici
Date:
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:

>Dear all,
>The ftp directory on Snake has "beta" and "release" directories. Is it still
>worth publishing the "beta" directory? It could confuse users who may
>consider "beta" as a more recent work than "release".
>I would be in favor of removing the "beta" directory to keep it simple. The
>other solution would be to rename "beta" 0.9.2 and "release" 1.0.0.
>
The only problem I can see with removing the beta directory concerns
debian users who used to refer to this place for automatic update with
apt-get. Apt will give an error for these users. A polite way of
handling this would be to give a "page has moved" http answer when
requesting any page placed under beta/debian/
IMHO, we should consider this for next beta/non-beta releases.

Regards,
Raphaël




Re: FTP directories

From
"Dave Page"
Date:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz@club-internet.fr]
> Sent: 26 September 2003 23:07
> To: jm@poure.com
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] FTP directories
>
>
> Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
>
> >Dear all,
> >The ftp directory on Snake has "beta" and "release"
> directories. Is it
> >still
> >worth publishing the "beta" directory? It could confuse
> users who may
> >consider "beta" as a more recent work than "release".
> >I would be in favor of removing the "beta" directory to keep
> it simple. The
> >other solution would be to rename "beta" 0.9.2 and "release" 1.0.0.
> >
> The only problem I can see with removing the beta directory concerns
> debian users who used to refer to this place for automatic
> update with
> apt-get. Apt will give an error for these users. A polite way of
> handling this would be to give a "page has moved" http answer when
> requesting any page placed under beta/debian/
> IMHO, we should consider this for next beta/non-beta releases.

Hi Raphael,

Unfortunately the vast majority of the mirrors are out of our control at that level - besides, they are ftp mirrors so
wecannot give http response codes :-) 

Regards, Dave.