Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

9 January 2007

• 10:54   Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Gregory S. Williamson
• 11:33   Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Jim C. Nasby
• 11:41   Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan db@zigo.dhs.org
• 11:50   Re: table partioning performance Simon Riggs
• 11:54   Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Jim C. Nasby
• 11:55   Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Gregory S. Williamson
• 11:56   Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Nörder-Tuitje, Marcus
• 11:58   Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Gregory S. Williamson
• 13:10   Running PG on cluster files systems Hannes Dorbath
• 13:15   Re: Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14 Rolf Østvik
• 13:17   Re: Running PG on cluster files systems Devrim GUNDUZ
• 13:18   Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Dave Cramer
• 14:13   Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Tom Lane
• 14:52   Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Plugge, Joe R.
• 15:45   Re: Postgresql Configutation and overflow Jim C. Nasby
• 16:11   Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Jeff Frost
• 16:30   High inserts, bulk deletes - autovacuum vs scheduled vacuum Jeremy Haile
• 17:02   Re: High inserts, bulk deletes - autovacuum vs scheduled vacuum Florian Weimer
• 19:18   Re: High inserts, bulk deletes - autovacuum vs scheduled Jeremy Haile
• 22:05   group by will not use an index? tsuraan
• 22:32   Re: group by will not use an index? Adam Rich
• 22:39   Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Gregory S. Williamson
• 22:42   Re: group by will not use an index? Scott Marlowe