Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From db@zigo.dhs.org
Subject Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan
Date
Msg-id 37813.192.121.104.48.1168346136.squirrel@zigo.dhs.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Horribly slow query/ sequential scan  ("Gregory S. Williamson" <gsw@globexplorer.com>)
List pgsql-performance
I don't think I understand the idea behind this query. Do you really need
billing_reports twice?

> The query:
> explain analyze select
> w.appid,w.rate,w.is_subscribed,sum(w.hits) AS Hits ,sum(w.sius) AS IUs,
> sum(w.total_amnt) AS Total,sum(w.hits) * w.rate AS ByHits,
> sum(w.sius) * w.rate AS BYIUS
> from bill_rpt_work w, billing_reports b
> where w.report_id in
> (select b.report_id from billing_reports where b.report_s_date =
> '2006-09-30')
> and (w.client_id = '227400001' or w.client_id = '2274000010')
> group by 1,2,3
> order by 1,2,3;

Maybe this is the query you want instead?

select w.appid,
       w.rate,
       w.is_subscribed,
       sum(w.hits) AS Hits,
       sum(w.sius) AS IUs,
       sum(w.total_amnt) AS Total,
       sum(w.hits) * w.rate AS ByHits,
       sum(w.sius) * w.rate AS BYIUS
  from bill_rpt_work w
 where w.report_id in
       (select b.report_id from billing_reports b where b.report_s_date =
'2006-09-30')
   and (w.client_id = '227400001' or w.client_id = '2274000010')
group by 1,2,3
order by 1,2,3;

/Dennis


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: table partioning performance