Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

5 August 2020

• 00:42   Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend Daniel Gustafsson
• 00:49   Re: 13dev failed assert: comparetup_index_btree(): ItemPointer values should never be equal Peter Geoghegan
• 00:50   Re: Confusing behavior of create table like Peter Eisentraut
• 01:00   Re: 13dev failed assert: comparetup_index_btree(): ItemPointer values should never be equal Tom Lane
• 01:04   Re: [patch] demote Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
• 01:27   Re: Confusing behavior of create table like Tom Lane
• 01:58   Re: Concurrency bug in amcheck Peter Geoghegan
• 02:17   Re: Concurrency bug in amcheck Alexander Korotkov
• 02:19   Re: Concurrency bug in amcheck Peter Geoghegan
• 02:59   Re: LSM tree for Postgres Alexander Korotkov
• 03:43   RE: Creating foreign key on partitioned table is too slow kato-sho@fujitsu.com
• 03:53   Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689) Amit Langote
• 03:56   Re: Add MAIN_RELATION_CLEANUP and SECONDARY_RELATION_CLEANUP options to VACUUM Bossart, Nathan
• 04:04   Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689) Justin Pryzby
• 04:06   Re: new heapcheck contrib module Peter Geoghegan
• 04:12   Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689) Amit Langote
• 04:21   pg13dev: explain partial, parallel hashagg, and memory use Justin Pryzby
• 04:44   Re: pg13dev: explain partial, parallel hashagg, and memory use David Rowley
• 05:01   Re: pg13dev: explain partial, parallel hashagg, and memory use James Coleman
• 05:11   Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other Alvaro Herrera
• 05:13   Re: pg13dev: explain partial, parallel hashagg, and memory use Justin Pryzby
• 05:14   Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other Alvaro Herrera
• 05:27   Re: pg13dev: explain partial, parallel hashagg, and memory use David Rowley
• 06:00   Re: Keep elog(ERROR) and ereport(ERROR) calls in the cold path David Rowley
• 06:12   Re: LSM tree for Postgres Peter Geoghegan
• 08:25   Re: pg13dev: explain partial, parallel hashagg, and memory use David Rowley
• 08:46   Re: For standby pg_ctl doesn't wait for PM_STATUS_READY in presence of promote_trigger_file Kyotaro Horiguchi
• 09:00   Re: Handing off SLRU fsyncs to the checkpointer Thomas Munro
• 09:08   Reg. Postgres 13 Joel Mariadasan (jomariad)
• 09:13   Re: LSM tree for Postgres Konstantin Knizhnik
• 10:08   Re: [PATCH] - Provide robust alternatives for replace_string Asim Praveen
• 10:08   Re: LSM tree for Postgres Konstantin Knizhnik
• 10:29   Re: Reg. Postgres 13 Magnus Hagander
• 11:12   Re: Yet another issue with step generation in partition pruning Amit Langote
• 11:22   Re: [PATCH v1] elog.c: Remove special case which avoided %*s format strings.. Michael Paquier
• 12:56   Re: Add MAIN_RELATION_CLEANUP and SECONDARY_RELATION_CLEANUP options to VACUUM Masahiko Sawada
• 14:09   Re: LSM tree for Postgres Dmitry Dolgov
• 14:19   Re: display offset along with block number in vacuum errors Robert Haas
• 14:24   Re: Can a background worker exist without shared memory access for EXEC_BACKEND cases? Bharath Rupireddy
• 14:45   Re: Can a background worker exist without shared memory access for EXEC_BACKEND cases? Robert Haas
• 15:52   Re: Which SET TYPE don't actually require a rewrite Magnus Hagander
• 15:55   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions Amit Kapila
• 16:02   Re: Can a background worker exist without shared memory access for EXEC_BACKEND cases? Bharath Rupireddy
• 16:14   Re: Can a background worker exist without shared memory access for EXEC_BACKEND cases? Robert Haas
• 16:31   Re: [PATCH] - Provide robust alternatives for replace_string Alvaro Herrera
• 16:42   Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..." Ashutosh Sharma
• 17:04   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting Dmitry Dolgov
• 17:07   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions Dilip Kumar
• 17:08   Re: new heapcheck contrib module Robert Haas
• 18:20   Re: Yet another issue with step generation in partition pruning Etsuro Fujita
• 18:41   Re: Allow some recovery parameters to be changed with reload Robert Haas
• 18:49   Re: Replace remaining StrNCpy() by strlcpy() Tom Lane
• 20:30   Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689) Tom Lane
• 20:44   Re: Hybrid Hash/Nested Loop joins and caching results from subplans Andres Freund
• 20:53   Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689) Robert Haas
• 21:13   pg_rewind is not crash safe Heikki Linnakangas
• 21:21   Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689) Tom Lane
• 22:34   Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..." Robert Haas
• 22:58   Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..." Robert Haas
• 22:59   Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689) Robert Haas
• 23:13   Re: Hybrid Hash/Nested Loop joins and caching results from subplans Robert Haas
• 23:19   Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689) Tom Lane
• 23:20   Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689) Robert Haas
• 23:36   Re: new heapcheck contrib module Peter Geoghegan
• 23:38   Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend Andrew Dunstan
• 23:40   Re: Hybrid Hash/Nested Loop joins and caching results from subplans Peter Geoghegan